Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Greyplod/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Account called Uttorks was created today to protect the same articles Greyplod is editing;Guaçuí, Santo Antônio de Leverger. Seems to be and old experienced user trying not to get banned for 3 rollbacks. Must have other accounts. Goldencerebro (talk) 22:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC) Goldencerebro (talk) 22:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Where am I on a campaign against him? You people who don't do your job. This guy redirected the article Guaçuí, which is a city, to "Brazilian Socialist Party", which has nothing to do with it. Then he began to include as a "notable person" in dozens of articles, extreme left-wing politicians, and in all cases, there are several notable people in that city that this guy didn't even think about including, as his concern is to make political propaganda and nothing else. It is a single purpose account. He even fakes his identity saying he us from Finland when he is clearing Brazilian. Furthermore, this "Notable People" section is highly questionable due to its total subjectivity, in other Wikipedias this section has been banned because it is partial, subjective and looks like a teenage women's gossip magazine section. Now, why don't you do your job instead of protecting users who clearly have multiple accounts like this one, who with a 1 month old account acts like a 15 year old user on Wikipedia and on top of that creates a secondary account so he can't do 3 reversals with his primary account?Goldencerebro (talk) 01:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Your friend is very polite, check it out: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greyplod&diff=prev&oldid=1208728157&title=User_talk%3AGreyplod&diffonly=1 Goldencerebro (talk) 23:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , you seem to be engaged in a campaign against . Putting that aside, it looks like Uttorks's reverts are sound, so I don't see the disruption required to block for socking.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I've blocked the one for that personal attack. Izno (talk) 00:16, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * As for, I don't see sufficient cause to block that account either. Closing this SPI accordingly. Izno (talk) 00:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

User Satanichellmaster666 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Satanichellmaster666) is clearly a blocking bypass of the banned user Greyplod (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Greyplod), who also created the Uttorks account (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Uttorks), i.e. using sockpuppets and blocking bypass. Accounts recently created to mantain data placed by Greyplod in articles. Goldencerebro (talk) 22:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC) Goldencerebro (talk) 22:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please merge to Sockpuppet investigations/Greyplod., repeating your previous accusation that Uttorks is Greyplod or this other user without diffs indicating a close similarity, given the warning in the archive from , will result in the blocking of your account for harassment and/or personal attacks. Izno (talk) 00:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That aside, does have behavioral similarity to, which does indeed look like Greyplod also, and since one of those users is now blocked, I think we're firmly in the 'potential block evasion' category. Compare Sanatichellmaster's edits to  to  as particular examples. Izno (talk) 00:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree with merge, can you explain to me how to do this?Goldencerebro (talk) 01:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It is not something you need to or should do. Clerks specifically are allowed to do it because there are some unusual rules with it. Izno (talk) 02:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * moved, tagging socks as suspected, closing. 0x Deadbeef →∞ (talk to me) 15:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC)