Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Guanna/Archive

Evidence submitted by Bonadea
Per their user page at User:Guanna3. Expresses intent to keep creating socks. bonadea contributions talk 11:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * ✅ the following are related:


 * ✅ the following are related:


 * It is highly that the two groups are related. As such, I went ahead and blocked all the above accounts and blocked an open proxy.  Tiptoety  talk 07:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, I tagged all the users as sockpuppets. All we need now is to create a category. MunasheHungwe is the older account. Minima  c  ( talk ) 09:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Marking for close, everyone's blocked. TN X Man  13:35, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Allmightyduck
New sock, some evidence can be found at this diff, which says they will just "Make more Guannas".  Allmightyduck  &#xF8FF;  What did I do wrong?  15:29, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
TN X Man 17:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

23 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Gnrundead made this "declaration", and Annaug made this. The latter went on a vandalism spree (also involving an attack at Mentifisto) that got them blocked by another admin. Among the targets was Pokemon Buffy Titan, previously hit by Guanna. Along the way, they created this list of fellow travelers, which includes Hms starwort.

In addition to being fingered by Annaug, Hms starwort made this, again aligned with an edit by Guanna.

Finally, while I was blocking and tagging, Jacob1318 contributed this, notice in particular the edit summary. They have previously been blocked for vandalism, at first indef, but then reduced.

Quite a mess, so I would like a CU to clear things up. To make it more complicated, the master account seems to be, but the previous SPI case is under Guanna's name, so I chose to extend that one.

All accounts listed here have already been blocked. Favonian (talk) 11:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - This could maybe be a bunch of friends messing around and editing in collusion? CU can clarify. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


 * . We'd rather not go trapsing around in the technical data of accounts unless there's something quantitative to be gained from it, like a block. All listed accounts are already blocked so there's no need for a check. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 01:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Huh. The blocks were done after I endorsed and were independent of this case. I'll close then, I guess. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)