Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Guinea pig warrior/Archive

Evidence submitted by Bilby
After Guinea pig warrior was blocked for 72 hours, the IP appeared a day later to engage in similar edit warring on the same topics. The edit summary here, of "Because on the discussions page, I told you that you could have caretaker next to Primus's name and that was it", seems to relate to this post by Guinea pig warrior. Thus it seems highly likely that they are the same. I believe that Guinea pig warrior is generally a good editor, but seems to be having problems with edit warring. Bilby (talk) 06:50, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * IP has been blocked for a week; Guinea pig warrior's block has been extended for the same duration. Thanks, Peter Symonds ( talk ) 11:29, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

08 May 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

This user is editing exactly the same articles as GPW, in the same manner as GPW (he never explains any of his changes and block reverts articles).

He appeared not long after GPW was indefinitely banned. 93.182.190.37 (talk) 14:18, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Sorry, but I dont know who this person is. Thegamemuster (Thegamemuster) 16:17, 8 May 2011

I dont know who this guy is. I dont know who you are. How am I suppose to defend this random charge, when I dont even know this you or this guy? All I can say is, the person you are looking for is not me. Thegamemuster (Thegamemuster) 20:23, 8 May 2011

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * 93.182.190.37, care to back up your claims with some diffs? I'm not really seeing it. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 17:22, 8 May 2011 (UTC)