Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gurbinder singh1/Archive

Report date June 26 2009, 04:31 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

User has a long history of abandoning user ids after being blocked or becoming well-known.
 * Evidence submitted by - sinneed (talk)

Most recently, the 210.210 and Gurbinder tag teamed here

At the end of the user:Morbid Fairy era, 210.210 joined the Sikh article effort. Satanoid (blocked in Dec and abandoned), who Morbid Fairy claims to be, used the same "roll-back-by-hand" method of taking ownership. Most editors simply will not resist a steady attack and abandon these Sikh-extremist-related articles, or become abusive, or both. - sinneed (talk) 04:31, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Morbid Fairy aka Satanoid see here, has been previously reprimanded for this type of behaviour under the Satanoid account and for a WPOuting violation here. His behaviour towards Sineed is very bad. He was also recently blocked for Vandalism for 31 hours. Thanks --Sikh-history (talk) 08:10, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

-- Peter Symonds ( talk ) 11:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * IP hardblocked for two weeks. It is obvious that the IP = Gurbinder singh1.
 * Gurbinder singh1 has been indefinitely blocked.
 * Morbid Fairy has been indefinitely blocked for continued warring, possible sockpuppetry and disruptive editing.


 * Note for future reference that while Morbid Fairy has been confirmed as a sockpuppet, per the Satanoid case this account is unrelated to Gurbinder_singh1. Nathan  T 16:39, 25 August 2009 (UTC)