Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HCamrone Media/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

this diff is particularly suspicious as they were never blocked, however it's likely the autblock from the master was still in place. They've since created several articles using the masters website. See also this on Wikidata, almost exclusively edited by Jones Barley. Praxidicae (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
 
 * what does "They've since created several articles using the masters website" mean? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * the fact that they apparently got caught in an IP autoblock, the wikidata contributions, and the fact that Jones Barley was created a week after HCamrone Media was blocked all make socking seem likely.  I'd selfendorse for CU.  -- RoySmith (talk) 22:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'm assuming Praxidicae is referring the blog (I think) that comes up when you Google the master's username. CheckUser won't be helpful here. Can you see why have a look at the accounts and when the unblock request was posted.? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:44, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , Ah, yes, the master is stale. I should have seen that.  Maybe just uw-agf-sock and move on? -- RoySmith (talk) 16:50, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , sorry for the late reply, see this. Praxidicae (talk) 12:12, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The COIBot report here pushes me over the edge to think that this is the same operator so should be blocked indef as the sock of a blocked account. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:58, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged, closing -- RoySmith (talk) 14:54, 23 May 2020 (UTC)