Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hair tongs alarm fan/Archive

Evidence submitted by Polargeo
Multiple edits from both of these users between Hair tongs alarm, Talk:Hair tongs alarm and Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Hair tongs alarm. Also the same POV from the IP on the hair tongs alarm talkpage here. This IP appears to have been used for excessive vandalism recently User talk:83.244.229.222. Polargeo (talk) 10:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hair tongs alarms excuse would make sense if Su-min4thewin had not come in on the article 2 hours later as this user's first ever edit. Both accounts were used exclusively on issues related to this article including backing each other up on the talkpage. Polargeo (talk) 07:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims. Some of the edits for the article hair tongs alarm were made on a communal computer, next in line for using it was Su-min4thewin who asked what i was doing and has also blessed me with an edit(Hair tongs alarm fan (talk) 19:01, 6 November 2009 (UTC))

Comments by other users
I cannot say when Sumin4thewin made the edit, and am surprised that it was 2 hours later than my edit, but this evidence is not necessarily incriminating, and it would definitely be wrong to delete both accounts without hardline evidence. Besides, him and myself would only have one IP address in common, if you wish to research this fact, then please feel free to do so.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * This looks like one of those typical single-purpose cases. Once that single purpose is gone (i.e. the article is deleted), the accounts will disappear.  Checkuser probably not necessary.   Wknight94  talk  03:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
No action taken. Looks more like meatpuppetry to me, and the AFD is now over with the article deleted. MuZemike 00:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)