Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HalfShadow/Archive

Report date April 13 2009, 03:24 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Rockiesfan19 (talk) 03:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Rockiesfan19 (talk)

Nice try. I don't even have a secondary account. Being as the account in question has since been blocked for disruptive editing, I suggest this be closed as a bad-faith nomination. I'd do it myself, but since it involves me I'd prefer someone else do it. Half Shadow  16:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * This case will be closed with no action in 24 hours if evidence is not provided by the reporter. ——  nix eagle email me 03:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This looks to me like the case does not have a leg to stand on whatsoever and is merely meant to disrupt. The reporting user was blocked about an hour ago. As such I'm inclined to simply close this case as harassment and be done with it. The two listed accounts don't even have any intersecting edits. ——  nix eagle email me 03:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed. It's possible rwiki19 and rockiesfan19 are the same person, but it seems petty to CU for that. Wizardman  03:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps not...this is at least the third false SPI he's filed in 24 hours against seemingly random users (the other two were already CSDed). There is also an AN/I thread going on about this editor. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree with Nix on this. I've been over the edits and it appears to just be a bogus/disruptive request. I'm tagging this as pending close.  Syn  ergy 17:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 *  Syn  ergy 17:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)