Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hamkar 99/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets


There is reason to believe that Jasoorth is a sockpuppet of the blocked Hamkar 99. Both users fought an edit war in Hazaras article.--KoizumiBS (talk) 01:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The best I can do is, and even that's a stretch. They're all from the same country, that's about it.  There may well be UPE going on, but I don't see enough to block for socking, so I'm going to close this. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:42, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


Thepowefulhnation's edits resemble the contributions of a blocked member Hamkar 99. For example, removing information about the Mongols from the article Hazaras.--KoizumiBS (talk) 09:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , apparently this is another sockpuppet .--KoizumiBS (talk) 20:58, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These two accounts are not quite 100% confirmed, but they are exceedingly to one another (✅ might be a better description), and their shared editing interests is enough to convince me. Blocking, etc; removing talk page access in line with the block of the master.   Girth Summit  (blether)  12:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * this case has been closed. If you have suspicions about another account, please raise a new report - but you're going to have to present some evidence to explain your suspicions. Girth Summit  (blether)  08:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


There's reason to believe that Jasoorth is a sockpuppet of the blocked Hamkar 99. Both users fought an edit war in articles: List of Hazara tribes & Hazaras. Both users were involved in a war of edits regarding the Mongolian and Turkic components in articles about the Hazaras. Diffs: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Users ignored the consensus that the Hazaras have huge Mongol influence: see talk page (1, 2) and comments. Earlier, Jasoorth began to actively edit precisely after the blocking of Hamkar 99. Both users are characterized by destructive editing.--KoizumiBS (talk) 22:37, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I ran a check on Jasoorth in 02 May 2022 and declined to block based on the results. What has changed since then? -- RoySmith (talk) 18:38, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Requested information not supplied after 5 days, closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:10, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


There is reason to believe that Iampharzad is a sockpuppet of the blocked Hamkar 99. Both users were involved in a war of edits regarding the Mongolian and Turkic components in articles about the Hazaras. Diffs: Iampharzad's contributions - 1, 2; Hamkar 99's contributions - 1, 2. Both users are characterized by destructive editing and both users removed reliable sources linking the Hazaras with the Mongolian peoples. Both tend to provoke an edit war. Iampharzad started editing in the article immediately after Thepowefulhnation was blocked, Hamkar's sockpuppet. Diffs: 1, 2.--KoizumiBS (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, ! I added diffs. Can you consider my application please?--KoizumiBS (talk) 00:07, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * , I can say that both participants are equally biased regarding the assessment of information from reliable sources about the Mongolian component in ethnogenesis of the Hazaras. Hamkar 99's comments: 1, 2, 3. Iampharzad's comments: 1, 2. Both tend to violate the guidelines from the WP:OWN. In these discussions, the arguments of other participants are equally ignored: Talk:Hazaras, Talk:Hazaras.--KoizumiBS (talk) 06:43, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Comment - Hi,   and   have added same information on Hazaras page.-PravinGanechari (talk) 18:34, 5 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, Don't lie , The diff that I have added in the comment, same you have added above. PravinGanechari (talk) 19:53, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, ! I've added your diff with clarification that Thepowefulhnation is Hamkar's puppet. Also previously I added two other Hamkar's contributions.--KoizumiBS (talk) 21:50, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * FYI. --Jack Frost (talk) 13:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Those diffs demonstrate a reversion, rather than independent addition of identical content. Whilst these users cross over on Hazaras; their edit summaries differ, their edits differ somewhat, and there's no 'smoking gun' which I could see. Unless you are able to provide diffs which clearly demonstrate a pattern of behaviour evidencing that the accounts are operated by the same user, I will be closing this without action. Jack Frost (talk) 04:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * This essentially boils down to two accounts with a similar point of view regarding a polarising subject. However, there are enough differences that I remain unconvinced that these accounts are operated by the same user. . --Jack Frost (talk) 16:15, 10 September 2022 (UTC)