Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hamza590/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

One thing that makes me think that they might not be the same person, is that Azharmohammed has made edits here where Hamza has shown no interest, hence my preference for a CU. In my strong opinion, Hamza needs further look anyway, since his edits, particularly the apathy for quality and community preference reeks very strongly of paid editing. I also notice Naagin content on Azharmohammed's talk page, which makes me think of Vicky12333 again, like we're setting up for more disruption at that semi-protected article. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Four points of intersection so far, despite Azharmohammed being 4 days old.
 * I've made laborious efforts on Hamza's talk page to educate him on virtually every issue under the sun. MOS:TV issues, general MOS issue, sourcing, arbitrary changes, interpretive labels. Total silence. Most recently I had to harangue him about how we use "Sentence case" in headings, not "Title Case". No response, no change in his behavior. He basically does what he wants, doesn't care about community preferences, and never responds. Similarly, Azharmohammed doesn't care about capitalisation norms, hasn't responded to my first notice to him, but resubmitted the problematic content.
 * The Azharmohammed account was created a few days after I blocked Hamza for poor editing.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
❌.--Bbb23 (talk) 09:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Closing with no action. There's not enough to establish sockpuppetry here. Any behavioral issues may be raised at the usual venues. ~ Rob 13 Talk 14:30, 30 June 2017 (UTC)