Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hanafunda/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * 1) Before this report, they were only edited once in Second Sino-Japanese War. After Miiyooh's editing is rolled back, it is restored by Hanafunda who has more edits.
 * 2) After I posted a discussion on User talk:Hanafunda, User:Miiyooh has an unusual number of edits, there may be a WP:PGAME problem.
 * 3) Their reasons for removing sources are very similar, .(They all question whether the source is reliable.)

PS:If I didn't find suspected WP:PGAME behavior, I wouldn't report it because the discussion is ongoing. Rastinition (talk) 12:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Miiyooh sees what they consider to be undue weight by an unreliable source. They remove it.
 * Due to a lack of explanation in the edit summary, you restore the content.
 * A day later, Hanafunda, who is an active editor in the topic, comes across the restoration. They also believe David Askew is unreliable, and undo your restoration.
 * You undo Hanafunda and begin a discussion, pinging Miiyooh as well. So far, so good.
 * Miiyooh receives an email about the notification, and responds. They then begin messing around on their userpage, testing out transclusions of userboxes.

Making a few edits to your userpage is usually a symptom of being a newbie, not a sock. In addition, there's no real need to farm autoconfirmed, as Second Sino-Japanese War is neither protected nor under any CT restrictions. Thanks for the report, but this seems innocent. . DatGuyTalkContribs 18:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)