Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Haneywonders/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
There has been a problem going on lately at the article Paul Moser. It started when an IP registered to a children's hospital in Alabama attempted to "correct" the article, which resulted in all of the categories being removed and the article sounding promotional. They then proceeded to do it again on another IP address after being reverted. This resulted in the /64 and the children's hospital IP being blocked. In a violation of this block, and after the article was protected to prevent vandalism, an account named Haneywonders asked on the talk page for the same changes to be made that they attempted to make, but did not understand despite me and another editor talking to them. (see discussion) They were then blocked for block evasion, and since then, these two accounts have made the exact same edit request that Haney did. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  00:50, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I am not asking for the IP addresses and the accounts to be connected, just to see if the accounts are connected to eachother. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  00:51, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * the other account was technically the anonymous IPs: and   wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  03:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * 198.245.254.124 was blocked for block evasion at 2600:1000:BF00:1A27:0:0:0:0/64. wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  03:58, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . v  v   - Given we're on the third account in a week and a half, a check for sleepers and/or an underlying rangeblock would be great. --Jack Frost (talk) 01:44, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 03:32, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * - Floating and Unway are both ✅ to Haney. But,  you blocked them for block evasion, which I assume means there's another account.  What was the other account? -- RoySmith (talk) 03:42, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Blocking all as ✅. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)