Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Harassment Survivor/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

It's not hard to understand why "Harassment Survivor" would insert non-BLP-compliant content regarding sexual harassment allegations. But then these other SPAs cropped up right after to do the same thing. Two were blocked, and the page was EC protected, but now we have two others accusing us of whitewashing an article in order to protect a powerful subject. We've been receiving these SPAs in good faith (save for the one who was already blocked as a sock), but I suspect it may be just one person. Especially given Legal Eagle's recent accusation that we're blocking anyone who tries to contribute. It's possible they're not socks at all, but a checkuser will aid us in determining how to handle the situation going forward. Pinging  S warm   ♠  02:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Yes, I agree with Swarm's analysis above, and these accounts need to be looked into by checkuser. — Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  08:19, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Group 1 – the following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * Fagen.1990
 * Chopps2018
 * Diamont.phil
 * Ladybird1003 is to Group 1.
 * Group 2 – the following accounts are / to each other and ❌ to Group 1:
 * SwisherGot88
 * Legal Eagle9999
 * Harassment Survivor is very to Groups 1-2.
 * I've blocked Diamont.phil without tagging. The remaining accounts will have to be decided based on behavior.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
 * This case has sat untouched here long enough now that any additional action would likely serve no purpose. Closing. --Deskana (talk) 13:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)