Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HarpLady01/Archive

20 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Two newly-created accounts with similar-looking names. Both have been used only on William Schnoebelen, both editing to the same effect (i.e. altering wording in order to package Schnoebelen's controversial and widely-disputed claims about his past as undisputed fact). HarpLady01 has also made legal threats.

It might be a honest mistake by a newbie unaware of WP's policy on sockpuppetry, but as I've noted here, Bostongirl70 seems to be engaged in deliberately dishonest editing, so I'm finding it hard to AGF. Will leave it to somebody less involved to decide what response is appropriate. GenericBob (talk) 09:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * From what I can see, one user said "qu," the other said "ack," close enough to sound like a quack to me. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:35, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'll call it on behavioral evidence. Blocked and tagged the sock. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:03, 21 July 2011 (UTC)