Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HarryPotterFan4747/Archive

24 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Superficial: There is a similarity between the two users' names. HarryPotterFan4747 was blocked on December 15, 2014, and TheAmazingRaceFan7474 started editing December 16, 2014. Though the editor interaction analyzer doesn't show any specific articles of intersection, they both tend to edit in children's articles and random biographical articles. There are also clear behavioral intersections: 1) Users tend to add parenthetical numbers, usually with no explanations. I believe the parenthetical numbers represent episode "segments". (Half-hour cartoons often have two cartoon "segments" per half-hour episode)
 * As HarryPotterFan4747
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * As TheAmazingRaceFan7474
 * 
 * 
 * 

2) User tends to be interested in death date calculations.
 * As HarryPotterFan4747
 * 
 * (Ignores adjacent template)
 * 


 * As TheAmazingRaceFan7474
 * (Also removes valid template)
 * 
 * (Also removes valid template)

I think that should be enough behavioral evidence to warrant a checkuser. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:54, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Damn that was fast, ! I swear, I just clicked submit! Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:57, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, also ✅ to NativeForeigner Talk 23:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * For any curious, check was ran for sleepers, none found. NativeForeigner Talk 23:56, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I saw it at AIV. :) NativeForeigner Talk 00:11, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

19 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Obvious similarities with other sock accounts by name. User here is adding weird numerical parentheticals as I experienced them doing here as TheAmazingRaceFan7474. Pretty ducky. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Addendum: It should be noted that although the user has engaged in problematic editing at the Arthur-related articles, typically by asserting his worldview that a running tally of story segments should be included and increase with each new episode (Episode 1 (2), Episode 2 (4), Episode 3 (6), etc)) in this edit the user appears to change a sourced box office gross to $112,743,250 when the sourced value is $113,307,962. This would tend to suggest a deliberate attempt to disrupt, rather than simply being stubborn. Disclosure, I found a cached version of the page from November 2014 that reflects this lesser value here, but there's no logical reason to use old data. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:16, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account blocked per duck. Mike V • Talk 03:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

21 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck by name. Editor prefers children's entertainment articles and they seem drawn to adding content in parentheses  often without context. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * WP:DUCK ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  01:06, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

18 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Clear similarity in name. *Fan4747 or *Fan7474. User tends to edit children's entertainment articles. There is an intersection at Veggietales. TheAmazingRaceFan7474 made these six edits with a net result of a single date range being changed. SkilletFan7474 made these 46 consecutive edits with a net result of a lot of numbers being added to the subject headers. I had a lot of problems with this editor at articles related to the Arthur children's TV series, where they kept adding odd segment numbers to episodes like here. So peculiar number changes are historically part of their MO. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * WP:DUCK ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  00:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

20 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar edits to adding unreferenced dates to same TV series episodes. Also similarity in names. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:13, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked per DUCK. Mike V • Talk 16:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

23 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck per 4747 (sometimes 7474). Interesection at List of Arthur episodes and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Yo_Gabba_Gabba%21_episodes&diff=648394189&oldid=645626835 List of Yo Gabba Gabba! episodes]. (Edits by previous socks ) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:15, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account blocked per duck. Mike V • Talk 01:56, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

01 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck per name Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:34, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * WP:DUCK ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  04:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

16 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similarity by name. Edits at Arthur per the others and Henry Hugglemonster like RedAmericanBandFan7474 and List of Sophia the First episodes like RedAmericanBandFan7474. Quack. Can we please get a mass revert going after the block please? My mass rollback tool no longer works. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:44, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * WP:DUCK ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  13:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

04 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck by name. Intersection with TheHungerGamesFan7474 at Mickey Mouse Clubhouse. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * WP:DUCK ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  20:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

09 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similarity by name, intersection with HarryPotterFan4747 List of Dinosaur Train here and here. Intersection with WinterJamFan7474 and SkilletFan7474 here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 12:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * WP:DUCK ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  14:52, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

01 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

St.LouisCardinals7474 is a duck by name and is still editing at articles related to the cartoon Arthur. I'm requesting a checkuser because another editor, MineUser (MinecraftUser) is also submitting unsourced dates at articles related to Arthur, and much of the disruptive headaches at this subject have come from 7474 socks, which is why I suspect this MineUser. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I appreciate the CU, Bbb, thanks. I do urge the clerk to endorse an indef of St.Louis on clear duckness, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * St.LouisCardinals7474 still hasn't been blocked for being a duck of the sock jobber. He's still editing here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are ❌ to each other. There is no way to confirm either to the master as all the previous socks are either stale or unconfirmed. My findings do not preclude St.LouisCardinals7474 from being behaviorally blocked if that is the clerk's view.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I have the WP:DUCKs with 7474 or 4747 in their usernames. MineUser (MinecraftUser) remains unblocked, for CU confirmed they were technically unrelated to St.LouisCardinals7474 and behavioural evidence doesn't really prove otherwise ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  21:55, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

03 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck by name. Editing at List of Arthur episodes Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:37, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked by, and I just tagged it. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  21:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

16 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similarity with 7474 in name. Disruptive interactions in children's television. Intersections at Red (band), Mickey Mouse Clubhouse (season 4), and VeggieTales (among others, I'm sure) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:15, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * WP:DUCK ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  15:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

23 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck by name. Intersection with St.LouisCardinals7474 here. Death date calculation here. (If you check the archive, you'll notice that this is one thing he was into). Another death date calculation here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  23:52, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

28 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack. This is a violation of WP:TVUPCOMING. Intersection at VeggieTales. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * DUCK ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  03:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

28 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack. Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:07, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already reported and blocked above. :) ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  22:53, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

30 June 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Editing children's TV articles. Unsourced content Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious sockpuppet. Blocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

08 July 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck by name. Edits at Henry Hugglemonster where other socks like St.LouisCardinals7474, SkilletBand7474, and RedAmericanBandFan7474 have edited. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:35, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * DUCK  ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  16:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

26 August 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack. After a final warning for unsourced/unexplained date changes to various kids' media articles, including Lyrick Studios, StormExpert's last edit at 17:51 is followed by HurricaneExpert's account creation at 17:55 and an unsourced/unexplained date change at 18:08 to Lyrick Studios Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - see: and .  Vanjagenije   (talk)  18:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The two accounts are ✅. I've blocked and tagged the puppet and blocked the master for an additional month.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:57, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

28 August 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

One day into a block for sock puppetry making false future entries in kids' TV shows/movies as "HurricaneExpert", "StormExpert" is back with more of the same. Sum mer PhD v2.0 13:15, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - similar username, similar interest, I think a Cu check is needed here.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  13:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * is ✅, blocked and tagged.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

07 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This sock operator tends to use weather-related names. 2005AtlanticHurricaneSeason is consistent with that. StormExpert edited at Arthur (season 19), as did AtlanticHurricane. In fact, both accounts have four articles of intersection, including three at Arthur-related pages, all within 15 days of one another. The fourth area of intersection is at Mountain Dew where the user adds flavors (as StormExpert) and adds more flavors (as AtlanticHurricane). Looking through AtlanticHurricane's edit history, there are lots of edits at List of VeggieTales episodes. A previous sock, HurricaneExpert edited Lyrick Studios, which produced VeggieTales. Pretty ducky, but given their propensity to sock, I'd like to see if there are more out there, please. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The account is ✅. Blocked and tagged. .--Bbb23 (talk) 16:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

11 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

StormExpert has edited VeggieTales articles in the past, as well as the article for the production company of VeggieTales, LyrickStudios. In addition, this new LyricStudios editor has added unsourced lists at Mountain Dew, which other socks like 2005AtlanticHurricaneSeason and StormExpert has done. Note also that LyrickStudios seems to prefer bulleted lists over plainlists, for example. StormExpert didn't like this plainlist template, and also prefers bulleted lists. Oh, and in those last two examples we can also note that he thinks the infobox is the place to put long, ridiculous lists of flavors, instead of referring readers to the body of the article. I have blocked LyrickStudios for a username violation (implied shared use). He will almost certainly create a new account, but I'm not sure if a CU is warranted yet. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

09 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

There's a bit of a twist here. The name formatting of this editor is similar to one of StormExpert's last suspected socks, LyrickStudios. This new sock has numerous edits at 1987 Atlantic hurricane season, which seems to match the "StormExpert" motif, though I haven't seen many edits in weather-related articles before, though StormExpert has used socks named after these articles, like. I believe that StormExpert is actually a sock of HarryPotterFan4747 and I'm hoping we can do a CheckUser to confirm that.

List of Yo Gabba Gabba! episodes is a common article. As LyrickStudios1983 (believed to be a StormExpert sock), as U.S.Presidents7474, as HarryPotterFan4747.

Arthur (TV series) is another common page.

As LyrickStudios1983, as 2005AtlanticHurricaneSeason (a sock of StormExpert) as SkilletBand7474

The reported sock has made a number of weird numerical edits like these where he appears to be summarizing the division titles won, in a completely non-intuitive way, in boldface. Not a competent decision. Editor appears to be into numbers. We see these numerical additions from StormExpert which are similar to these edits from LyrickStudios1983.

If StormExpert is determined to be a sock of HarryPotterFan4747, then we would have to move that archive to the right master. Thanks all! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:28, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The intent is to confirm socking (which is pretty much certain per evidence), but also specifically to confirm whether these two cases are actually a single sockmaster. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  20:02, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * - To compare LyrickStudios1983 to:
 * 1) to LyrickStudios
 * 2) to LyrickStudios7474 (DUCKed as a HPFan7474 sock per the numbers)
 * 3) to StormExpert confirmed socks (2005AtlanticHurricaneSeason and HurricaneCycloneAndTyphoonExpert are the most recent)
 * 4) to HarryPotterFan7474 socks (which were DUCKs without CU) (HockeyFan7474, BostonBruins7474 are the most recent)
 * Beautifully written,, thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The bottom line is there is only one master, HarryPotterFan4747. The StormExpert SPI should be merged into this one.
 * The following accounts are :
 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * I'll leave the administrative work to .--Bbb23 (talk) 21:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the stale accounts, somehow my mind calculated that 90 days back from October 9th was June 9th. I'll come back to this later tonight and merge the cases, retag the socks, etc. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  21:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I have blocked LyrickStudios1983 as a sock and reverted most of the easy-reverts. Thanks to all who were inconvenienced by this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear. The other accounts have not yet been tagged, and they should be tagged as CU-confirmed (I adjusted LyrickStudios1983). This was not an inconvenience, . It was a blessing as it allowed us to clean up this whole mess properly.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll leave the administrative work to .--Bbb23 (talk) 21:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the stale accounts, somehow my mind calculated that 90 days back from October 9th was June 9th. I'll come back to this later tonight and merge the cases, retag the socks, etc. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  21:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I have blocked LyrickStudios1983 as a sock and reverted most of the easy-reverts. Thanks to all who were inconvenienced by this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear. The other accounts have not yet been tagged, and they should be tagged as CU-confirmed (I adjusted LyrickStudios1983). This was not an inconvenience, . It was a blessing as it allowed us to clean up this whole mess properly.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll leave the administrative work to .--Bbb23 (talk) 21:43, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the stale accounts, somehow my mind calculated that 90 days back from October 9th was June 9th. I'll come back to this later tonight and merge the cases, retag the socks, etc. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  21:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I have blocked LyrickStudios1983 as a sock and reverted most of the easy-reverts. Thanks to all who were inconvenienced by this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear. The other accounts have not yet been tagged, and they should be tagged as CU-confirmed (I adjusted LyrickStudios1983). This was not an inconvenience, . It was a blessing as it allowed us to clean up this whole mess properly.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the stale accounts, somehow my mind calculated that 90 days back from October 9th was June 9th. I'll come back to this later tonight and merge the cases, retag the socks, etc. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  21:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I have blocked LyrickStudios1983 as a sock and reverted most of the easy-reverts. Thanks to all who were inconvenienced by this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear. The other accounts have not yet been tagged, and they should be tagged as CU-confirmed (I adjusted LyrickStudios1983). This was not an inconvenience, . It was a blessing as it allowed us to clean up this whole mess properly.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:42, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I have merged the cases and archives (I love when the histmerges are this clean, no overlap, everything's super clear), I have updated the tags on socks who were under StormExpert, and retagged StormExpert from master to sock. Thanks for your vigilance in linking these together and for your continued assistance in placating this sockmaster. :) ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  04:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

17 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

One of the Harry socks, StormExpert made this edit where he introduced a number of date ranges for series hosts in the infobox. Note the embedded note at the top of the page: "2. Do not add year or season information next to any judges here! That info is already in another section below and is against Template:Infobox television which says "Years and/or seasons should not be included"" StormExpert was clearly editing against community consensus.

In this edit, Stereo Heat adds date ranges to the infoboxes again and removes the embedded notes that instruct users not to add the ranges. In addition to this, he squirrely tries to fudge consensus by removing the template documentation entries that say "don't add dates". Pretty ducky, but considering how prolific this vandal is, a check for sleepers and such might be helpful. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:48, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Addendum: Come to think of it, it may be premature for a CU. I don't see a lot of behavioral similarities beyond that one example, and there were a few people who kept battling over years in the infobox. Might need to close this one as unconfirmed. I believe the user will be blocked soonish for disruptive editing anyway. That squirrely behavior won't fly. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are ✅ to . Blocked and tagged accordingly. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 03:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC)