Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hasfie/Archive

24 September 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

While doing RC patrol, I noticed several accounts using their user talk pages to create long articles on what appear to be non-existent tournaments for women's volleyball. Two of the accounts, and  linked to   a CU blocked account,. The tag notes that Azylicure is a sockpuppet of Hasfie. Being unfamiliar with this sock and seeing how there was no SPI, I contacted Reaper Eternal about.

After noticing another account appear today doing the same thing on their user talk page and Reaper Eternal appearing to be offline, I'm filing this SPI. I have found at least five accounts that are doing these edits. ,, and I blocked for being an obvious sock and  was blocked by Alexf for a user name violation. is related to the account as they had.

Tracking other accounts through non-CU means is difficult as while the theme is always women's volleyball, the contents are different. I did find this untagged, CU blocked by Mike V account:



...which transcluded Template:International volleyball on their user talk page, which is also transcluded by.

I know that the Hasfie socks data might be stale. I'm filing this SPI to confirm that somebody is using multiple accounts as a webhost for made up tournaments, that the accounts are related, and if they are related to Hasfie. Many of the Hasfie accounts are globally locked, so this appears to be something more complex than what I am aware of or have been able to figure out. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Added who was CU blocked by Ponyo.  Snooping Looking at Ponyo's block log, several other related accounts were blocked.  Obviously something is going on, but maybe I'm overturning a rock I don't want to overturn. All of these accounts are now blocked, so maybe there isn't anything else to do now. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:26, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  14:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * - to compare those accounts (except the master who is stale) and to look for sleepers. All have created fake volleyball articles in their userspace.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  08:58, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Although I found many other accounts, I found none that was not already blocked and/or globally locked. For completeness, the following accounts are ✅ to each other:
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.
 * I would appreciate it if the clerk would tag or adjust the pre-existing tags according to this CU.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * All tags are in order now. Closing.

03 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I blocked RaCJESS as a duck. While searching for other socks, I found 122.53.156.34 which was previously blocked for a week by Ponyo. I blocked the IP for a month as by deduction, I suspect that the IP is related to Hasfie. Requesting confirmation on the account and a check for other accounts that might be around. I looked for other accounts and found nothing, but as I mentioned on my original report, it is difficult to find accounts using non-CU means. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . A sleeper check was run about a week ago (see the SPI archives), and there's no reason to expect to find more sleepers now. The already-listed sock has been indeffed, and a CU check cannot be used to link an IP address to an account.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 06:04, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

25 November 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Per pattern of creating Women's volleyball articles in user space Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare those two accounts to each other and to Hasfie socks.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  09:38, 26 November 2015 (UTC)


 * KingZoe999 and KING THE GREAT are ✅ matches to each other. Also ✅ as related to those two accounts is . This group of accounts looks to be related to Hasfie.  Elockid  Message me 14:34, 26 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Behavioral link to Hasfie is not strong, I'm bot sure it's him. I'm indeffing socks and warning the master (ZOE KING 518). Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)