Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HeadMouse/Archive

05 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

often became combative when his edits at Walt Disney World Monorail System were challenged, often resulting in posts on the article talk page such as this from 2007, which was soon followed by a six-month block for "chronic edit-warring and incivility". The user was indef'ed in April 2008 after creating a sock account,, to evade the block and continue his edits at the aforementioned target article. When confronted, user became argumentative, as noted here, despite evidence confirming the connection. HeadMouse then created another sock,, in June 2008 and resumed same editing pattern at same target article. Knotslanding was blocked as a sock of HeadMouse in December 2008, which prompted another outburst that he had done nothing wrong. Now we come to Crazy Blue Eyes, who went live in March 2010. For the bulk of the user's limited history, they have indeed been constructive, even delving into other articles aside from the preferred target on the WDW monorails. Beginning in October 2012, user began reverting to form after editors began questioning uncited information in the monorail article. Edit-warring and combative posts on article talk page resumed, with making the claim that this may be yet another sock of HeadMouse, which prompted this response. Upon review of the edit histories of the mentioned socks and Crazy Blue Eyes, including the editors' argumentative natures and the blanking of their talk pages after receiving warnings, this appears to be a clear-cut case of WP:DUCK. --  McDoob AU  93  06:15, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I agree; this does look like a sock of HeadMouse. I've blocked the sock account indefinitely. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:28, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

10 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I believe this edit is a pretty clear self-outing. Not sure if a CheckUser search will help, since he'll just start up a new account when the previous one is blocked, instead of activating a sleeper.  McDoob AU  93  16:13, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ Crazy Blue Eyes, Crazy Blue Eyes2, and . -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  00:09, 14 November 2012 (UTC)