Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Helper3490/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Three accounts attempting to get an article on the fashion brand Nico Didonna. CCollins34 has made two attempts to create the article, both being deleted under G11. Jackson3405 is the author of the current draft. JDrennan56 created a copy of the article in CCollins34's sandbox However, this might be a wider UPE given the history of other articles edited (e.g. there are SPAs which look like they are related on Youmanity). Thus the CU request to look for any others. Pahunkat (talk) 20:32, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 21:10, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅, along with:
 * which is the senior account, so I'll move this. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * which is the senior account, so I'll move this. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New editor removing COI template from an article that has been the subject of (UPE?) editing by previous socks in this case. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:57, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Technically ❌. Different landmass, plus other technical differences hard to explain away. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 17:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Closing this based on a mix of Dreamy's CU result, WP:AGF and WP:ROPE. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)