Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hhggtg3279/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User:Hhggtg3279 was blocked a few days ago. Now User:DrChaos56, a newly created account, is making the exact same type of edits that Hhggtg3279 made before being blocked, also using the same type of vocabulary. I can't be sure about that, but it could very well be. Maze waxie  17:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ + . Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This is one of the many sockpuppets used by User:Hhggtg3279. Maze waxie  10:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * He is continously adding poorly sourced material and he doesn't understand that blogs are not reliable sources too. -- Maze  waxie  10:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
 * As I wrote on his talk page: "I have a lot of evidence. You are a newly created account, you are making the exact same edits on the exact same pages as Hhggtg3279 / DrChaos56. You are using the exact same writing style of those other account (i. e. not signing your comments, adding the same sources). So yes, I have evidence." I hope this helps to speed up the investigation. -- Maze  waxie  11:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

That's not really evidence your just coming up with excuses to get an innocent user banned from Wikipedia, look please reconsider your accusation because I for one don't have any idea who the user mentioned above is and two I have been editing on here finely for nearly a week and suddenly you randomly decide to make a bold claim.


 * "Innocent"? Every edit you are making has been reverted because you keep adding unreliable sources, and casually every edit you make is the same you made using Hhggtg3279 / DrChaos56. You edited on Zendaya, List of Spider-Man supporting characters, Spider-Man: Far From Home, not to mention Jessica Jones (TV series) that you cant edit anymore because it's protected, same with Mary Jane Watson. This is not a bold claim, it's obvious you are the same person. -- Maze  waxie  11:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Again I am not the same person who used those accounts, this is my first Wikipedia account before I created this account 6 days ago, I only used to edit anonymously from just using my ip.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I would like to add I have zero idea who this user is, I am only reverting his edits to maintain the reliability of the article as per original consensus https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider-Man:_Far_From_Home on the chameleon people agreed to keep it linking to Dimitri Smerdyakov. Additionally this user in addition to revert warring, makes frivolous claims despite have zero evidence.
 * There is a note (that you are removing with your edits) that explicitly states: "Neither source confirms Dimitri as Chameleon, please do not link him". So you are not only adding informations based off blog posts and other unreliable websites, but you are also going against the consensus. -- Maze  waxie  11:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

It's happening again. Always the same articles, always the same writing style. Maze waxie  10:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Now he is also made an edit using an IP 86.8.201.8. -- Maze  waxie  10:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Also using this: 80.2.23.183. -- Maze  waxie  10:58, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * And of course he is starting to insult me. -- Maze  waxie  10:59, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Again. -- Maze  waxie  11:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Always the same edits. He also used IPs recently. It's almost certainly him. Mazewaxie ( talk  •  contribs ) 13:56, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked and tagged. When you file a report at SPI, you must present evidence in the form of diffs. You presented none. Because I am very familiar with this master, I found sufficient evidence on my own to check, but you can't and shouldn't count on that. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes I know, in the past I provided examples but this time I did not think about it. Thanks for letting me know and happy editing. -- Mazewaxie ( talk  •  contribs ) 16:31, 22 August 2019 (UTC)