Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HighnessAtharva/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Based on the edit history at The Wardstone Chronicles it seems clear that this user is aware of 3RR and edit-warring prohibitions and is using these IPs to do the reverting.

183 just did two simple reverts of the reversions of HighnessAtharva's additions, HighnessAtharva came back, was reverted and 1.23 added the edit back -- how often is an IP's first edit to name drop an editor involved in a dispute that it is not an SP?

The page has been protection requested, but if either of these IPs are the user then they have easily violated 3RR and seem to here only to see their bloated fancruft on the encyclopedia rather than an in-universe fansite wiki were it might be better served. JesseRafe (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Hey, I'm a new editor with not Much experience and knowledge about wikipedia. I do not have multiple accounts on wikipedia. But I do confess that I just edit sometimes without logging in and recently have been edit-warring but now have realized my mistake. I just created a good new article "Clash-A-Rama" today. Please, my only aim is to expand this encyclopedia and add more information but if it is unnecessary then its my fault. Please forgive me, thanks. I'll be contributing to the wikipeidia. I do not indulge in vandalism and anything like that. Please take a look at my contributions. Thanks and sorry for inconvenience. HighnessAtharva (talk) 17:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * So, when questioned previously, you lied? Either way, if you did edit while being logged out, you edit-warred over the content and violated the WP:3RR policy. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 00:40, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The edits in question are old enough that a block would be punitive. Consider this your final warning on edit warring and sockpuppetry. Closing. King of  &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)