Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Historyeditor44/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
SPAs dedicated to removing the same content from Fat men's club with the same justifications over an extended period of time. Compare Special:Diff/1126568901, Special:Diff/1126666323, Special:Diff/1150378660. Given the degree of persistence, page protection may be appropriate if a range block is infeasible. I'm very much WP:INVOLVED but think that this is some clear DUCK behavior.signed,Rosguill talk 04:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC) <

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I don't really see this as socking - the accounts/IP don't have temporal overlap with each other, and I don't think they are trying to present themselves as different people. The sequence of events could be explained by an IP editor registering an account, and after a few months, creating a new account because they lost the password to the previous one, wanted a different username, etc. That's not a policy violation. There does seem to be a general issue with edit warring and/or disruptive editing, but SPI isn't an ideal venue to address that. I would suggest taking this to ANI or ANEW if it continues. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 11:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)