Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Historyfeelings/Archive

09 May 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The user Historyfeelings was involved an edit war, therefore he/she evaded that by editing from the IP address 46.185.160.11. The page history of the page "Jerash" shows that the changes made by 46.185.160.11 are exactly the same as those made by the user Historyfeelings.

The changes made by the IP address 46.185.160.11 are identical to the change made by the Historyfeelings, which happened just in the middle of the editing war.


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerash&diff=490971768&oldid=490968532 (change by Historyfeelings)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerash&diff=491088639&oldid=490973287 (Change By 46.185.160.11)

In addition the page history is showing that the user Historyfeelings involved in several editing wars with other users since he/she started editing the page on 24 February 2012‎. Banimustafa (talk) 02:59, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The IP hasn't edited in days, so I'll mark for close. If there's more activity, please feel free to refile. TN X Man 14:30, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

09 May 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Could you please investigate Historyfeelings for sockpuppetry. Please the contributions made to the articles "Jordan" and "Jerash" for using different IP addresses.

Historyfeelings is involved in IP sockpuppetry using not only two, but three IP addresses in addition to his/her user account. The first IP address is 46.185.160.11, which he used in the edit war in "Jerash" article and the IP address 46.185.138.244 in the edit war on "Jordan" article to evade his/her account blocking.

These two different IP addressees in addition, to a third IP address 94.249.93.242, which he used to communicate with User:Boing! said Zebedee, while he was blocked. please see the changes to the two articles made in during the edit war.

Here are the details:

In "Jerash" article:
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerash&diff=491088514&oldid=490973287 (change made by 46.185.160.11)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jerash&diff=490971768&oldid=490968532 (change made by Historyfeelings)

In "Jordan" article:
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jordan&diff=491143234&oldid=491099133 (change made by 46.185.138.244)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jordan&diff=490973173&oldid=490972956 (change made by Historyfeelings)

Reagrds Banimustafa (talk) 18:29, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - CheckUsers will not disclose connections between accounts and IP addresses. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:52, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

16 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

1. The user:JohnRak is only a socketpuppet of the user:Historyfeelings or a hired crowd as it is obvious from the history of his contributions which were all relevant to the dispute between me and the user:Historyfeelings in the article Jerash. The user:Historyfeelings expanded the dispute to cover the pages Souf and the article Bani Mustafa. The first contribution of the user:JohnRak was dedicated for complaining about the sources provided in Bani Mustafa article as shown here, while the second contribution was adding AFD to the article Bani Mustafa as shown here. 2. The user:JohnRak admitted in his talk page that he has a real life connections with Historyfeelings, as he claimed that they work together, which prove that he is either a socketpuppet or a hired crowd. In addition, the user:Historyfeelings used the the talk page of JohnRak as a platform for attacking me, which also support the argument that he is only a socketpuppet for the user:Historyfeelings.

3. The IP address 46.185.160.11, was used in the edit war in "Jerash" article. Please notice the similarity of the contribution:
 * change made by 46.185.160.11
 * change made by Historyfeelings

4. The IP address 46.185.138.244 was used by the user:Historyfeelings in editing the article "Jordan" to evade the block of his account. Please notice the similarity between the contribution made by the user Historyfeelings and the IP address 46.185.138.244:
 * change made by 46.185.138.244
 * change made by Historyfeelings

5. The IP address 94.249.93.242 was used by the user:Historyfeelings for evading his blocking.

6. The IP address 80.90.168.29 was used by the user:Historyfeelings for vandalizing the article Bani Mustafa by deleting information that affects its quality and credibility in order to justify the deletion proposal made later by the socketpuppet user:JohnRak. Here is a summary of the changes by the IP address 80.90.168.29.

7. The IP address 80.90.168.138 was used by the user:Historyfeelings for adding hoax to the article in order to justify its deletion as shown here

8. The IP address 46.185.141.158 was used by the user:Historyfeelings for influencing the discussion regarding the dispute in Jerash article. Please see section protected in the discussion of Jerash article

9. The IP address 94.249.72.86 was again used by the user:Historyfeelings for influencing the discussion regarding the dispute in Jerash article. Please see section "protected" and the section "Edit request on 19 May 2012" in the discussion of Jerash article Banimustafa (talk) 09:58, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * The accusation on this page is "bad faith" and user:Banimustafa making a fake case to attack me and to prevent his own editing being examined.

I had a disputation with him about the content of article Jerash, and it was solved by DRN (look here please). But he didn't like the way it was solved, he just want to force his point of view for his family and town.

Now everyone who tries to edit any page of the pages he watch, he always accuse him/her it is a sock puppet of me!!!

I would like to note that Banimustafa has been blocked for sockpuppetry (Sockpuppet investigations/Banimustafa/Archive) and Banimustafa has accused me of sockpuppetry (Sockpuppet investigations/Historyfeelings/Archive), an accusation that did not result in a determination that the accusation is true.

Banimustafa has a history of vandalisim; user:Wakwakwiki is a banned sockpuppet of Banimustafa, who has his own history of blocks user:soufray is a banned souckpuppet of Banimustafa. Thank you --  HF  ► 16:22, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Replies on points (1,2) above, which they are concern me:


 * I have no clue about the edit war you involved in, thus I am not interested in the content of that articles except article Bani Mustafa which I nominated for an AFD cause -once again- a guy from Jordan talk about it, then I read it to find that it deserve to be deleted. So it is not my fault if you think that guy is historyfeelings. All what I can say is that I don't even know both of you. Anyway as long as I am not anyone but me, things will be easy.--JohnRak (talk) 09:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU won't link IPs, but (static) was suspicious during the block of the alleged Master here.  Those 4 edits scream duck.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  22:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * - They may share an interest, but evidence is insufficient to request CU check the logs for user JohnRak Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;  22:27, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Static IP 's edits do look odd, but are from a completely different ISP than 94.249.93.242, so difficult to draw a direct line. The other IPs edits are inconclusive, and the similar edits were simply reverts, so can't draw a definitive conclusion.  This leave us with, which looks like a match, and  which is possible but not probable due to technical issues and insufficient data. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;  22:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Closing as no action taken. If there is new evidence, please feel free to refile. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—►  20:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

06 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

1. The user:JohnRak is only a sockpuppet of the user:Historyfeelings. This is clear from the history of his contributions since its creation as the first contribution for the user was to propose AFD to the article bani mustafa which is obviously not a normal purpose of creating a user. The AFD was a "bad faith" nomination because of the the dispute between me and the user:Historyfeelings in the article Jerash. The first contribution of the user:JohnRak was dedicated for complaining about the sources provided in Bani Mustafa article as shown here, while the second contribution was adding AFD to the article Bani Mustafa as shown here. In addition, the user:JohnRak admitted in his talk page that he has a real life connections with Historyfeelings, which was a cover up story to the sockpuppetry.

2. The IP address 80.90.168.138 was used by the user:Historyfeelings for adding hoax to the article in order to justify its deletion as shown here.

3. The IP address 46.185.160.11, was used in the edit war in "Jerash" article. Please notice the similarity of the contribution: * change made by 46.185.160.11 * change made by Historyfeelings Please note that due to the nature of the dispute it is very unlikely for a real anonymous user to make identical changes which supports the point view of the user Historyfeelings.

4. The IP address 94.249.93.242 was used by the user:Historyfeelings for evading his blocking.

5. The IP address 80.90.168.29 was used by the user:Historyfeelings for vandalizing the article Bani Mustafa by deleting information that affects its quality and credibility in order to justify the deletion proposal made later by the socketpuppet user:JohnRak. Here is a summary of the changes by the IP address 80.90.168.29.

6. The IP address 46.185.141.158 was used by the user:Historyfeelings for influencing the discussion regarding the dispute in Jerash article. Please see section protected in the discussion of Jerash article. The english was made broken intentially, but the style of writing and the purpose of the contribution is the same. The words which were used by the claimed contributer was almost identical to those used previously by the user:Historyfeelings.

7. The IP address 94.249.72.86 was again used by the user:Historyfeelings for influencing the discussion regarding the dispute in Jerash article. Please see section "protected" and the section "Edit request on 19 May 2012" in the discussion of Jerash article. Again The english was made broken intentially, but the style of writing and the purpose of the contribution is the same. The words which were used by the claimed contributer was almost identical to those used previously by the user:Historyfeelings.

8. The IP address 46.185.138.244 was used by the user:Historyfeelings in editing the article "Jordan" to evade the block of his account. The changes made to the article by the IP address are almost identical to those made by the user:Historyfeelings. Please notice the similarity between the contribution made by the user Historyfeelings and the IP address 46.185.138.244: * change made by 46.185.138.244 * change made by Historyfeelings

The user seems to depend on a a dynamic IP address to evade tracking it. However the simmilarities between the IP addresses is obvious and the context of the contributions is a smoking gun. Banimustafa (talk) 18:12, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * This is the fourth time user:banimustafa accuse me of sockpuppetry with same circumstances & keep repeating same words same issue. an accusation that did not result in a determination that the accusation is true. I assume bad faith with that user cause recently I've asked for an SPI for him, an investigation that proved he uses sockpuppets for vandalism.(look here)

I would like to note that Banimustafa has been blocked for sockpuppetry (Sockpuppet investigations/Banimustafa/Archive)

Banimustafa has a history of vandalisim; user:Wakwakwiki is a banned sockpuppet of Banimustafa, who has his own history of blocks user:soufray is a banned souckpuppet of Banimustafa.--  HF  ► 15:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This is unfair, irrelivant and "bad faith" accusation. I am commited to the rules of my unblocking since I become aware of wikipedia policy regarding the use of multiple accounts and this can be verified by the history of my contributions. The user:Historyfeelings has been blocked several times and was banned for his unlawful practices as shown here. The user unblocking conditions bannes him from accusing me of vandalism, however he continues with these unlawfull accusations as shown above. He is also banned from using multiple accounts and IP addresses. Now, the user is violating his unblocking conditions. Please review his unblocking conditions here. I have good reasons to suspect a consistent sockpuppetry by the user:Historyfeeling which are supported by the evidences I listed above. A checkuser will diffinetly support the technical connections between the 2 accounts and the 8 IP addresses as well as a simple analysis of the context and the purpose of the contributions made by these accounts and IP addresses. This is a serious case of "bad faith", consistent and persistent sockpeppetry which has been repeated for more than ten times using 8 different IP addresses and 2 diffirent user names in order to influnce the relevant discussions. Banimustafa (talk) 20:04, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - JohnRak's earliest edits are sufficiently interesting that a check is probably a good idea. T. Canens (talk) 17:10, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

JohnRak is ❌. No comment with regard to the listed IPs. --MuZemike 23:11, 14 July 2012 (UTC)