Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hithap/Archive

01 November 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edits the same articles. Laun chba  ller  09:25, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Per Sockpuppet investigations, I don't see any abuse of the accounts. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:19, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

See also: User talk:Launchballer Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:36, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Please note that the presumed master is very . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:09, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * - Information on how this use of multiple accounts is abusive will be needed before this case can proceed. Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 16:21, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Her Ajrit username is definitely a violation of WP:USERNAME because it is confusing to type, but another look I can't see anything.-- Laun  chba  ller  19:40, 1 November 2013 (UTC)


 * - No indication of abusive use of the accounts Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 04:58, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing with no action; not a violation of WP:SOCK. If the username is in question, it should be brought up at WP:UAA Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 04:58, 2 November 2013 (UTC)