Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hizimes/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both editors made the necessary 10 gnomish edits to be able to create an article, and then created the identical The Red Movement, for which Hizimes was blocked. Socks or meatpuppets, but in any case disruptive. Note that Hizimes user account was created on 18 October 2021 and only started editing the next month, and Wagesdales was created on 20 october 2021 and started editing only today: this indicates that there may be other sleepers around. Please G5 and perhaps salt the article as well. Fram (talk) 09:19, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The best I can do is . They're using the same proxy service and I think they're also spoofing UAs. I don't see obvious sleepers, partly because of the UA spoofing; not a lot of activity on the underlying proxied IPs, either. Behavior is going to be the best bet here. Katietalk 15:05, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * - please indefinitely block Wagesdales as a suspected sock; the articles are substantially identical, and they are using the same ACPERM gaming tactic as the blocked account. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)