Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hmstrrnnr/Archive

Evidence submitted by Geeky Randy
There have been disruptive edits from both users. Their typing style is the same (lack of caps) and their wording is similar. It was first noticed here, and upon further investigation, things match up. Neither of their contributions are very helpful; a trace of the IP address leads to the same area that the user claims to be from. There are just too many coincidences and interuptions for this to be overlooked and tolerated. Geeky Randy (talk) 03:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Now the accused is claiming that his brother is responsible for the disruptive changes, despite saying earlier that he had nothing to do with the edits. Hmstrrnnr is defending himself here. When originally suspected, why didn't the Hmstrrnnr just say, "No, that's not me, that's my brother." The confusion and mistaken allegation could've been a little more understandable and believable. Instead, as cited in the evidence I submitted, Hmstrrnnr refers to the disruptive IP as "the same guy". If he knew it was his brother, why not just say, "It's my brother." Hmstrrnnr's story and defense is changing with the realization that a connection has been made between him and the disruptive IP. Geeky Randy (talk) 18:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
There has been almost zero constructive edits from, and I'm blocking him indefinitely for disruptive editing. The IP has not edited in two days, so I'm leaving it unblocked for now. Tim Song (talk) 22:19, 30 March 2010 (UTC)