Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoEuhophonium/Archive

14 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both users just registered a couple hours ago, and so far have only made edits that involve adding cnspan to anime/manga-related articles, such as with and  for HoEuhophonium, and  (which blankets most of the lead with them) and  for Harves745ting.  十  八  09:37, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Very few people know about the existence of cnspan, let alone new editors, which means that it is quite likely that this user is a previously existing editor who has returned under a different name. The only edits made so far involve cnspan tagging, with most of these appearing as if the user is trying to make a point. -- benlisquare T•C•E 09:42, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * These two accounts definitely appear to be attempts to avoid WP:SCRUTINY while making very WP:POINTed edits. —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * What about DragonsRondo? It seems unlikely that "HoEuhophonium" is a new user, and that is enough to see where the sockpuppet comes from, so I believe "HoEuhophonium" to be a sock of "DragonsRondo" following his behaviour in the past few weeks on the articles: he has been adding unnecessary tags to articles which I contributed past.--Infinite0694 (talk) 15:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Added who is performing very similar edits as the other two. This time, adding No footnotes to articles earlier edited by the previous two socks. —Farix (t &#124; c) 11:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Vivian also has posted user warnings to my talk page and others, accusing them of being WP:SNEAKY  because we have reverted her overtagging on No footnotes on articles that have footnotes. Her edits have been quite disruptive and could rather be used to find a citation to support the statement rather than to tag anything that doesn't have a footnote, including statements that are WP:BLUE  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Both accounts are only adding cnspan to articles .  Vanjagenije   (talk)  20:47, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The data is pretty much . Any connection to each other or previous cases will need to be based upon behavior. Mike V • Talk 21:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

20 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * Added who is apt to post the unnecessary warnings to user talk pages as stated above, same behavior as Vivian Mii. .--Infinite0694 (talk) 17:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC), reposted by  as it took place after the original request was closed. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 06:33, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The behavior is that Vivian Mii would place unnecessary tags such as "no footnotes" on manga/anime articles that have footnotes, then when one of the editors reverts that with explanation, the user then posts a warning note on the person's talk page. After being warned not to do such disruption, the user started the account to do the same type of behavior. The user has targeted editors who are regular contributors in anime and manga articles here. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 06:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Please also see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 06:44, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

After going through the contributions of a possible sockpuppet (in which he harassed both myself and Infinite0694), it's probably reasonable that this sockpuppet is likely the same as HoEuhophonium. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 08:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I think I've blocked them all. I concluded Sockpuppet investigations/Dragonron/Archive was the most likely candidate. At least one user was using open proxies - there's probably not much more to do here. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

25 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility
 * The similarities between Empire M and Imecle69 have led me to believe they are the same person(Block evasion). So, given this obvious socking, I request that blocks be issued on this account.--Infinite0694 (talk) 13:57, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * left a groundless message on the User:Zzuuzz talk page in "sockpuppets" through Proxy.--Infinite0694 (talk) 14:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It appears the account and IP have been blocked. Mike V • Talk 17:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)