Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoelzer/Archive

25 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

These two users are SPAs that have an obsession bordering on fetishism against Gartner and for some reason can't separate using a website as a source from copyright infringement. Per WP:DUCK these are definitely the same person. Biker Biker (talk) 18:51, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

In an edit to my talk page Sgates05 stated "we are a big company and many colleagues in my department say your "Mobile Device Management" edit in wiki distorts competition" which is a clear indication of conflict of interest and professional jealousy. Commercial interests cannot run Wikipedia. I left a COI warning on his talk page. The quicker you stop this sockpuppet, the better it will be for Wikipedia. --Biker Biker (talk) 21:19, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ plus Courcelles 17:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * All blocked for abuse of multiple accounts. I went with indef for all three, since they're clear single-purpose accounts used deceptively in the same article. Jafeluv (talk) 12:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

01 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Sockmaster & one sock previously blocked. Now he pops up with a new sock to make the exact same edits Biker Biker (talk) 22:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Duck blocked and semi'ed the target. Courcelles 22:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)