Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Homerjay90/Archive

Report date January 1 2010, 16:54 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

User has used account to reverse edits by puppeteer and has used account to vandalize talk pages.  ttonyb (talk) 16:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by  ttonyb (talk)


 * Homerjay90 has continued to use a sock puppet account (Wheelock7002t) after being warned.   ttonyb  (talk) 19:47, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

User is again starting to use sockpuppets after being blocked for such actions. See.  ttonyb (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by  ttonyb (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users
 * It appears User:Wheelock7002t is a single purpose editor who has only edited articles in common with User:Homerjay90, and most specifically Ttonyb1's talk page. Both seem to infrequently use edit summaries, and both have been changing calendrical articles in tandem for example their changes to the tense of an article.
 * User:Homerjay90 is -> was:, , , etc.
 * User:Wheelock7002t is -> was:, , , etc.
 * I also have noted another interesting shift in both of their edits.
 * On December 30, User:Wheelock7002t starts by adding a paragraph about the common era to each of the years in the 2000s. In those changes, a strange format appears, #### th, which is not consistent with the manual style: . Then mid-day both users started reverting these changes. , and
 * They appear to have uncommon turn of phrase when they talk about dates, years, and the usage of past tense as can be seen on Ttonyb1's talk page, where they posted one after each other. Things to note:
 * After reference to a year they both use the roman numeral of that in brackets eg. "2009 (MMIX)"
 * They both talk about "the clock strikes 2010".
 * In this talk page, another sock puppet is revealed User:Wheelock34T. This user has edited Ttonyb1's talk page, formats the years with roman numerals, and has made the same manual style error on 2008
 * In my conclusion, both users have shown an unusual proficiency to use the Wikipedia tools, templates, other namespaces, and have directed their efforts in identical aspects of calendar dates on Wikipedia for an intense and short amount of time. Based upon these findings it seems very likely this user has other accounts unknown to us. Mkdw talk 20:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Nothing else needs to be done here. All blocks have already been issued. –MuZemike 22:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Conclusions