Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hongkham Souvannavong/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both accounts were created within a couple of days of each other, both are beauty pageant SPAs, both made identical edits to another editor's talkpage, claiming to represent the same commercial enterprise. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC) ☆ Bri (talk) 03:15, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I don't quite understand what's going on here, but there's some really strange stuff happening. First, if anybody had any doubt these are the same person, see this log entry.  But what's really weird is the edits to other user talk pages always come in threes, two by, shortly followed by a third by .  This pattern repeats itself for User talk:Felipevmvillalobos, User talk:Lemon.public, and User talk:Vermont helper.  I'm tempted to think this is scripted, but the timings aren't regular enough.  And all of those accounts have been blocked for various reasons, including socking (Sockpuppet investigations/I Nyoman Gede Anila).
 * But, the bottom line is I can't convince myself that they're doing anything that's actually disruptive. They've made COI disclosures in multiple places; perhaps not using the templates we suggest, but they've clearly made no secret of their connection.  And, we ask COI editors to only edit talk pages and request changes, which is exactly what they've done.  So, I've left them both uw-agf-sock and I think that's enough for now. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)