Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoppybunny/Archive

19 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

User keeps on making unconstructive edits to Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel article in the same way as Hoppybunny was before being blocked. I believe this user has been following the disruptive agenda of the banned user User:Bambifan101 (see also discussion at User talk:Hoppybunny and WP:LTA/BF101). I feel that it is necessary to check if there is sockpuppetry for this situation. Thanks, Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:18, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Adding a CU to check, but also to see if these accounts are part of a larger sockfarm, as indicated in the comments. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 04:56, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Tiptoety  talk 05:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 05:30, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

02 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

User has been repeatedly making unconstructive edits to Aqua Teen Hunger Force-related articles and has been creating non-notable links, such as List of minor Aqua Teen Hunger Force characters, that are very similar to Hoppybunny. This user continues to follow the same modus operandi as the disruptive banned user Bambifan101 (see also User talk:Hoppybunny). Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I just feel it's important to point out that, while unconstructive edits to Aqua Teen Hunger Force articles alone isn't really enough to make this connection, the combination of edits to these articles and to Yogi Bear articles in the same manner as Hoppybunny does seem far too suspicious to be a coincidence.--Yaksar (let's chat) 14:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Likely; CU for confirmation and sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:42, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅, no new sleepers, though. Jclemens (talk) 06:21, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

05 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

User continues to make unconstructive edits to film articles in the same manner as the sockpuppeteer in question, as well as Bambifan101, as detailed in the last reports. The combined edits on the Marmaduke and Alvin and the Chipmunks film articles Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing for confirmation and a possible rangeblock. This has been going on pretty consistently. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Going to block the underlying IP while I'm at it... Jclemens (talk) 06:28, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:02, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

16 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

User repeatedly makes unconstructive edits to Yogi Bear (film) in the same manner as Hoppybunny  before that user was blocked. As noted in my previous reports, this might be the same user following the disruptive agenda of the banned user Bambifan101. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. Dominic·t 05:27, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

05 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Same disruptive edits as the previous sockpuppets Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK, but endorsing for confirmation and sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:51, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅, no sleepers found. Frank  &#124;  talk  21:22, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

19 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same disruptive edits, same modus operandi. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 14:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Quack. The last time a check was done, no sleepers were found, and behavioural evidence here is pretty strong, so I don't see a CU needed here. Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  14:57, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Mrcarloh blocked and tagged. Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  15:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

29 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same disruptive edits, same interests. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

02 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same disruptive edits, same interests. I believe that this sock is yet another obvious WP:DUCK again and the edits are most likely in nature to the previous blocked accounts. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's been a few days. I'll endorse for confirmation and sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 18:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ and blocked. Cheers, Tiptoety  talk 20:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * No other accounts? Alright then - closing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

23 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same disruptive edits as previous ones. . I suspect that this is an obvious duck. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:54, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * We've had sleepers before with this account, so I'll endorse to confirm this one and find them. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:35, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ to be Hoppybunny. No obvious socks, IP is broadly used.  Keegan (talk) 04:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

12 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same disruptive edits as the previous socks, same interests (i.e. Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel). Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I noticed a pattern of messing with the order of the cast list, similar to Hoppybunny.--Yaksar (let's chat) 07:37, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Diffs, please, to show that they are the same. FWIW, these IPs geolocate to Venezuela. I don't believe Hoppybunny edited from there. Amalthea 13:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Rangeblock is impossible anyway. Report affected articles to RFPP for semi-protection. T. Canens (talk) 08:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)