Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HorseSnack/Archive

01 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Sock's two edits are to create a user page identical in layout to the master's, and to vote in an AfD to keep the master's article. Quack! Bazj (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Diff for sock vote in AFD NeemNarduni2 (talk) 18:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC) Diff for puppeteer vote in AFD Note strong consensus for deletion as hoax. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 18:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare the two.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Sock indeffed and the master blocked for 10 days. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:24, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * No,, this is an indef and it isn't even close. This is the exact picture of someone we do not want back in ten days (it is basically a vandalism-only account before the socking!) Courcelles (talk) 19:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)