Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Housesimple2017/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Violating COI on HouseSimple L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  16:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Promo addition by IP removed. L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  19:58, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

If it's any help to the case, the Thomas account was popped on UAA's books and wound up in the holding pen due to "Promo-y edits". Results on '28'. MM ('"HURRRR?'')  (Hmmmmm.) 00:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - It seems pretty ducky but there's not much of a crossover in edits to reaffirm the COI connection. Meatpuppet/sockpuppet, that's the deal.  QEDK  ( 愛  •  海 ) 17:55, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think CU is necessary here (yet). The Housesimple2017 account was username blocked on May 2nd and the Thomaskayhousesimple account was created May 25th. I've seen this often with spamusername blocks where the COI editor addresses the first blocking reason (the username), but not the second (the promotional edits). It would probably be easiest just to ask them if they are the same editor and then move forward from there. As an aside, the article reads like a PR piece.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:44, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Whatever you see fit. Let's see if we garner a response and we'll move accordingly. -- QEDK ( 愛  •  海 ) 18:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * No further action required.  QEDK ( 愛  •  海 ) 20:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)