Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Huhshyeh/Archive

04 May 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both user have tremendous similarity in the way they are holding a discussion with the motive to wear down the other party with different arguments each time(changing goal post) and making glorious claims of editing as per reference in similar wording. See this discussion by sockmaster and 1, 2 by sockpuppet. See this diff summary by sockmaster and this by sockpuppet.

Both user have been 'thanking' me for my edits they want to undo. I do not know where the thank is recorded I get it in the notification. I should also point out that the sockpuppet has mentioned me in ani claiming POV pushing. Updated both user page with notice of sock puppetry and a link to this page. Jyoti (talk) 11:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

It's all IT and IP addresses. The Wiki Admins can clearly tell that this is a single person. Hence, technically, there is no need to prove it to a user like Jyoti who had been accused of bias and POV. His/Her previous talk page clearly shows these; now the person has magically got the right to rollback; wish the WP Admins have a relook at these rights Huhshyeh (talk) 21:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Huhshyeh

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Firstly, I edited the article with only valid sources unlike the nominator who removed allegations against a right-wing organization such as and secondly, I reported the user in ANI for POV pushing including removal of sourced content from article Abhinav Bharat and in other article as mentioned by User:Sitush here. Since, I restored the sourced content with references so this editor is now trying to block me as I disagree with his POV. But though the evidences are seem to me poor, I have no issues since I am unrelated with User:Huhshyeh.Edmondhills (talk) 13:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


 * If possible I would request the admin to also check the discussion on the ani page itself. I do not wish to drag content dispute to this page. Jyoti (talk) 18:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * And if possible I would request the admin for a checkuser on Jyoti based on his editing behavior. Also, I find it silly how he blaming me as sockmaster while its not proved yet. And I did thank you because of collaborative edits yet you keep removing source like this. I believe a CU on the nominator would be worthy particularly when another experienced editor  responded to ANI of his alleged POV pushing. Edmondhills (talk) 19:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I suspect your account to be sock puppet. Why don't you request a cu on me if you feel so? Jyoti (talk) 02:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Did you miss this I believe a CU on the nominator would be worthy particularly when another... ? Edmondhills (talk) 06:51, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * You may have to submit a small form instead of mentioning it in comment. Jyoti (talk) 07:09, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Firstly, this not your concern and secondly I leave that to the concern admins. Unlike you I do not want accuse an editor who differ with my opinion ;) Edmondhills (talk) 07:15, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The behavioral evidence is too thin for a block, and no SPI clerk or CU has taken interest in endorsing this case for CU, so I am marking it closed. if you want to open an SPI investigation on, you may do so at the main page of WP:SPI, but you must specify what other account you think he's abusing. Just throwing around words like "I want an admin to CU him" is meaningless. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 03:30, 14 May 2014 (UTC)