Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Humanidk/Archive

22 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All these users are blocked. I believe Humanidk is the oldest account. Asking for a CU to see if the underlying IP range can be blocked as this person seems to be creating new accounts even more frequently. Neil N  talk to me 14:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing for a CU to check if a rangeblock of the underlying IPs is plausible (as discussed at User talk:Bbb23) ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  14:59, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * All of the accounts are ✅ plus:
 * In my view a range block is not feasible because it would cause too much collateral damage. Sorry.
 * Could a clerk please tag/retag the accounts as CU-confirmed with the correct master? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * All socks and master tagged as confirmed ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  23:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Could a clerk please tag/retag the accounts as CU-confirmed with the correct master? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * All socks and master tagged as confirmed ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  23:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

27 November 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Neil N  talk to me 07:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Added for recording purposes. Blocked. --Neil N  talk to me 07:02, 27 November 2015 (UTC)