Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hurricane Chandler/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

On the AFD, Hurricane Larry and Lilac Trench both had a similar edit. (1), (2), (3) also in userpage (1), (2)  HurricaneEdgar    01:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Additionally, is  – lots of IP crossover (note also ). It is possible, based on technical data, that these accounts are operated by distinct individuals who are strongly connected to each other in real life. This possibility is strongest for Hurricane Su, but cannot be ruled out for the others. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Even putting the CU results aside, there is a clear connection between these accounts. primary purpose has been to vote in AfDs and RM discussions, whereas  do have a more substantial editing history, there is still significant overlap in their edits. Whether this is all the one person, or a group of individuals editing in concert, is effectively irrelevant; both are in breach of policy. Given the blatant subversion of consensus,  - Please block all 5 accounts, with no prejudice to a compelling block appeal. --Jack Frost (talk) 11:50, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Noting that is by far the oldest account, their editing history is entirely negligible compared to . Given  is technically indistinguishable to the others, whereas  is less closely related, I've moved the case from Sockpuppet investigations/Hurricane Larry to Sockpuppet investigations/Hurricane Chandler. --Jack Frost (talk) 11:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * --Blablubbs (talk) 12:28, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Additionally, is  – lots of IP crossover (note also ). It is possible, based on technical data, that these accounts are operated by distinct individuals who are strongly connected to each other in real life. This possibility is strongest for Hurricane Su, but cannot be ruled out for the others. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Even putting the CU results aside, there is a clear connection between these accounts. primary purpose has been to vote in AfDs and RM discussions, whereas  do have a more substantial editing history, there is still significant overlap in their edits. Whether this is all the one person, or a group of individuals editing in concert, is effectively irrelevant; both are in breach of policy. Given the blatant subversion of consensus,  - Please block all 5 accounts, with no prejudice to a compelling block appeal. --Jack Frost (talk) 11:50, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Noting that is by far the oldest account, their editing history is entirely negligible compared to . Given  is technically indistinguishable to the others, whereas  is less closely related, I've moved the case from Sockpuppet investigations/Hurricane Larry to Sockpuppet investigations/Hurricane Chandler. --Jack Frost (talk) 11:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * --Blablubbs (talk) 12:28, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * --Blablubbs (talk) 12:28, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
I suspected that this is another sockpuppet because of the same pattern as the previous sock. (Request: CheckUser needed) (1), (2), (3) HurricaneEdgar    02:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to . Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)