Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Huyu90/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I partially blocked Huyu90 for extensive plot copyvio involving Asian media articles on 23 November 2021. NanaChan901 was created a day later, and edits around the same articles and has also added several of the same kind of plot copyvios; see the history of pages like Man in Love (2021 film) and The Bond (Chinese TV series), for example. Adding onto this is this interaction timeline provided to me by an ip, and the highly similar user pages:

My name is Nana Chan. I'm a Vietnamese-Japanese Wikipedian. I often create content related to the entertainment industry of Taiwan, South Korea, China, Singapore, Japan and other Asian countries.

Hello! (Xin chào) My name is Huyu90 and I'm a Vietnamese Wikipedian. I mainly edits articles related to Vietnamese, South Korean, Chinese and Taiwanese entertainment industries.

I'm assuming there's a good faith accident going on here; the user seems to have avoided copyvio issues recently, but they really should appeal from their older account. Moneytrees🎄Talk/CCI guide 04:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Group 1 ✅:
 * Group 2 ✅:
 * and share similar technical information to the other groups within a day and no other unrelated activity in this time period.
 * All the accounts listed in the groups and the possible sleepers are . Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 11:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * CU blocking all but Huyu90 for evasion. Leaving to clerk/patrolling admin/Moneytrees to decide what, if any, further blocks are needed for Huyu90. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 11:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Indeffed Huyu90; if there's some legitimate explanation for all these accounts, they can explain it in an unblock request. Tagging Myanh1ngaymoi as confirmed and everybody else as suspected. -- RoySmith (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * and share similar technical information to the other groups within a day and no other unrelated activity in this time period.
 * All the accounts listed in the groups and the possible sleepers are . Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 11:38, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * CU blocking all but Huyu90 for evasion. Leaving to clerk/patrolling admin/Moneytrees to decide what, if any, further blocks are needed for Huyu90. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 11:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Indeffed Huyu90; if there's some legitimate explanation for all these accounts, they can explain it in an unblock request. Tagging Myanh1ngaymoi as confirmed and everybody else as suspected. -- RoySmith (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Editing almost the same set of articles as previous account. Was also created 2 days after the previous sock were blocked.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  04:04, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 05:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yuanga998 is ✅ to all of Myanh1ngaymoi, NanaChan901, Huyu90, and Chuongtudi1989. Last week,  called most of the later bunch , but the additional data I can see now fills in some gaps so I'm calling them all confirmed and I'll go back and retag them.  I've left notes on cuwiki. -- RoySmith (talk) 05:34, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * PS, I took a quick look for sleepers and didn't see anything, but I didn't do a deep dive. -- RoySmith (talk) 05:36, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Restoring same content as Yuanga998.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  01:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The restoration of identical content makes it >90% confirmed, the username helps, and then the fixation on, of all things, awards starting with the word "Golden" clinches it. Golden Disc for this one . Golden Rooster here. Golden Lotus, Horse, and Eagle here . : Please block Jengga886 indefintely as a proven sock of Huyu90. CU  as unnecessary, noting that this account does not appear to have been a sleeper.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 01:25, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Sro23 (talk) 01:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Well that's fast. This time as IP, restoring the same reference (that isn't broken in anyway) that Yuanga998 and Jengga886 is doing previously.. Also noting that IP originated from Vietnam which was what Huyu90 and NanaChan901 userpage used to indicate as per archived.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  11:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Yeah, can't argue with those diffs. Funny enough we already have an LTA on that /38. For now let's just hit the /64, though. : . --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 12:14, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅, closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  16:50, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Similar style of username to previous sockpuppet.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  15:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

@Spicy Unfortunately, I don't have an exact diff to showcase the behavior hence this falls under point 3. However, reason on why I reported suspected sock is because of the similar behavior that I have encountered on Big Mouse where the restoration behavior is similar with the other blocked sock where they will restore content despite being told not to do so like with the reports previously on 7 January 2022 and 10 January 2022 involving Weekend (Taeyeon song). In addition to the strangely similar username style that is random name combined with 3 numbers, consistent in styling with 3 of the blocked sockpuppets.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  16:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
is a sock of Huyu90. These accounts have considerable overlap with each other and with previous socks (notably on articles related to Taeyeon and lists of Asian Vogue cover models). Most other editors to have made significant edits to the following articles: recently were Huyu90 and/or socks, and these two accounts, like the master, are active on or attached to viwiki. Also, they all use the source editor and never leave edit summaries. - I'm aware that previous accounts are stale, but endorsing to check for others since it's been a while since the last CU run and CU has found sleepers in the past. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * A similar username isn't enough to prove socking. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I didn't find the above evidence especially compelling, but I looked into this myself and I think there is enough evidence that this account, along with
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 20:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Stale, schmale, we've got notes. Yangyang129 is ✅.   are all ✅ . -- RoySmith (talk) 20:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . What about ? Spicy (talk) 20:49, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Ooops, missed DoJo. Yeah, they're also ✅. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. - please indef Yangyang129 and DoJo390 per the CU and behavioural evidence. The other accounts don't appear to be behaviourally related. Spicy (talk) 22:04, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * . Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 22:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Tagged, closing. Spicy (talk) 22:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)