Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hyperchapex/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

I have come across these accounts on the Neil Hudson article. Syntax has only edited this article [], they have removed sourced content and rewritten based on their version [], which adds promotional content which leads me to suspect that they may be linked to the BLP. They edited between February and May 2023. Combined started editing the same article in July. They again removed similar things to Syntax like this sentence [], [] and also added promotional content [][]. PoliticsWatcher also started editing this article in July and removed the same section as Combined [][]. In summary, I think one user is using multiple accounts or the accounts are related. Cowlibob (talk) 20:12, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These four are ✅. I'll send an email to functionaries-en because I need a second set of eyes on another possible connection... Courcelles (talk) 17:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * - Please leave this be for now unless you are a Checkuser. Courcelles (talk) 17:32, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay. Done. Moving to checked status, those four are confirmed, but there’s nothing else here that I was suspicious of. Courcelles (talk) 22:45, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hyperchapex is the oldest account. This case will need renaming. I see no reason not to apply indef-blocks to all accounts. That doesn't mean (IMO) that Hyperchapex can't appeal if they meaningfully engage. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * --Jack Frost (talk) 04:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Somehow no one had blocked. Done now. Courcelles (talk) 04:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC)