Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ICPA2022/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)

Assessment 10 and Programmatic Assessment both created identical userpages (since deleted). These pages were identical down to the same typo. They were virtually identical to Draft:Programmatic Assessment, except the draft does not have the typo. ICPA2022 has also created a promotional userpage about programmatic assessment, and aUser:ICPA2022/sandbox that just says "Programmatic Assessment". However, I am less certain about the connection there as the content of ICPA2022's contributions is different from the content contributed by the other two accounts. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 16:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC) ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 16:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Maybe this is the same person but I'm struggling to see what the disruption is here. ICPA2022 is soft-blocked, meaning that they are permitted to create a new account with a different username. I don't know why they would need two new accounts. However, those accounts have done nothing besides creating a (pretty inoffensive) userpage. Perhaps the user should be advised about COI, but I'm not seeing anything requiring admin attention at the moment. Closing. Spicy (talk) 16:03, 25 December 2022 (UTC)