Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IHaveAMastersDegree/Archive

11 January 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack fucking Quack. could it be any more obvious? Darkness Shines (talk) 00:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Further, both use highly negative section headers with the term "denial" in them. IHaveAMastersDegree Taj Darkness Shines (talk) 11:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' I don't appreciate the aggressive and uncivil tone in which this Sock investigation was placed. It seems awfully bad-faith to me. Also, I'm not IHaveAMastersDegree, simpleton. :) --Kaj Taj Mahal (talk) 01:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm nobody's sockpuppet but I don't know how to prove that I'm not. What do I have to do?  Is the burden of proof on me, the alleged puppeteer, or the accuser?  IHaveAMastersDegree (talk) 04:56, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * There's nothing you need to do, the burden of proof is on the person making the accusation. A checkuser or SPI clerk will evaluate the evidence and make a decision. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ❌. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  17:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)