Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/I AM GOD OBEY ME/Archive

14 April 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Aside from the obvious recurring username, the user's first edit was "IM BACK" (sic), with the edit summary "BEING BACK". Same sort of vandalism, on the same article, in the same 'all caps' style. Fairly clear and cut case. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 18:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * In the history of the article, I also see, but the CU data is, at best, , so I am thinking that this is some sort of coordinated vandalism effort. If the lulz continue, semi-protection will be the best solution. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * may also be part of this, it was also used for vandalism.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  23:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * It could be, but as we all know vandals are a dime a dozen. I'm doubtful that someone would come back 10 years later to pick up the same style of vandalism for a few minutes. With that said, I don't think it's worth splitting hairs trying to figure out if it's related in this situation. Mike V • Talk 23:43, 14 April 2015 (UTC)