Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iamandrewrice/Archive

Report date January 27 2009, 16:30 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by EconomicsGuy (talk)

Community banned is back to disrupt his pet article Latin Europe and evade his ban for the gazillionth time. The IP ranges are a match as is the usual logging in and out and refusal to accept consensus/edit warring. Same old behaviour. As Yamla points out on Iamandrewrice's user page he has a history of trying to fool people into thinking he is just another editor from the same IP range.

The checkuser case is here, where his IP ranges were also disclosed by Alison due to the extreme nature of his disruption.

This AN thread is also of interest. He claims to be able to tell that Iamandrewrice and share socks and he has intimite knowledge of the case yet he claims not to know me despite my username appearing extensively on the request he claims to have found through Google. Quite an accomplishment as checkuser requests are not indexed by Google and the request is not linked to anywhere on his user page. EconomicsGuy (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm 99,99% sure he's Iamandrewrice since the IP ranges and topic area clearly match. I also know he's not since I know what town he lives in and it doesn't match the location at all. The ranges are too big to block for any significant length of time so I'll leave it at that but I do ask that you consider semi-protecting Latin Europe instead. At least then he'll need to register an account first and this will be much easier to deal with. EconomicsGuy (talk) 11:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by EconomicsGuy (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * - Tiptoety  talk 18:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * is ✅ to be some of those IPs. The others quack loudly.  &mdash; Coren (talk) 01:04, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Are they of any relation to ? Tiptoety  talk 01:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅, endorsing Coren's conclusion. The IPs are all related to a single editor and per my archives are highly to be related to . Disclosing this here per privacy policy and per the nature and extent of the disruption -  Alis o n  â¤ 20:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you finally - now can these accusations stop being thrown around. 84.13.166.159 (talk) 20:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

- I think this is done with. ââ  nix eagle email me 01:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * indef blocked and tagged. Tiptoety  talk 03:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)