Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ibn abdul hassan/Archive

Evidence submitted by Spitfire19
Most of the IP addresses have only a few edits and they have been reverting edits supporting Ibn abdul hassan's view.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
should catch them all, SpitfireTally-ho! 19:59, 1 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Looks fairly straightforward to me. Account and range blocked 72h. Tim Song (talk) 04:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Profitoftruth85
All three are attempting to restore the same exact POV version of the page. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam_and_Sikhism&diff=367421032&oldid=367139460 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam_and_Sikhism&diff=366976855&oldid=366717058 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam_and_Sikhism&diff=366601886&oldid=366108219 They have also all falsely warned me http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AProfitoftruth85&action=historysubmit&diff=366977330&oldid=366235355 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Profitoftruth85&diff=367420490&oldid=367132336 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Profitoftruth85&diff=359310429&oldid=357940953 also one of them has already been in a sockpuppet investigation Sockpuppet investigations/Ibn abdul hassan/Archive

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Profitoftruth85 (talk) 17:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


 * - The evidence seems to be straight forward, so I don't think a check is necessary. Icestorm815  •  Talk  23:36, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the sock account indefinitely and the main account for a week. The IP range is too wide to perform a range block, so I just did a three day block, which might help out a little. Unless there is additional evidence to suggest more socks, I don't think a check is necessary. Icestorm815  •  Talk  23:36, 14 June 2010 (UTC)