Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Identityanddifference/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Considering this person's anti-Indian and anti-Hindu bias and blatant hatred as can be seen in edits by the previous sock here, here here. The edit summary here makes their identity clear which seems to be a continuation. Also notice the obvious hatred against Hindus shown by the new user's name Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Added interaction. I would urge admins to protect the Kho people article for now. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:10, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, ST47 (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

IP like the sock seems to be POV some sort of racialist agenda. Note how the sock master POV pushed Historical Vedic Religion (religion of supposed original Indo-Aryans) and the IP pushed "pure Indo-Aryan race". Also notice similar edits and. Interaction. Requesting Check User since I believe other new users and IPs with 118.107* using Special Communication Organization ISP might be active. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:44, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP edits too old. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

IP has the same agenda to POV push Historical Vedic Religion as the sock master, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:19, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
 * This edit summary is a dead giveaway. Similar racist rant on "Aryan" and "white" made by confirmed sock here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * This edit by 118.107.130.74 has been restored here by 118.107.130.75.


 * Considering multiple IPs active now in the article, I would like to request Check User. Other IPs with 118.107* using Special Communication Organization ISP might be active as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IPs already blocked. Nothing further to do; closing. Kevin ( aka L235 · t · c) 05:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Account created after sock Patriotpk was blocked per NOTHERE and later as a sock.

Same interest on Kho people for starters, but engages in copyright violations just like his account Identityanddifference. Orientls (talk) 04:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Yup. Seems like the sockmaster, similar copyvios, similar interest in Kho article, et al. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , compared to previous confirmed socks. ST47 (talk) 12:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * If they’re still being disruptive on their own, ask an admin familiar with the area to block them or take it to WP:ANI. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Has a habit of copy-pasting things from the source,. Considering this new user's name and activity centred around Shina people article, I doubt it is a sock. Interaction here Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:03, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I am not willing to block at this time - the username hits two of I&D's interests (the Shina and the Kho) and they do copy text from papers they're citing, but I don't believe that the evidence is strong enough to support a block based on behavioral evidence (and all known socks are stale). Closing for now. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Shinakho is tagged, but not blocked. From your comment above, I assume they should be untagged? -- RoySmith (talk) 01:01, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , yeah...I have no idea how I managed to do that. I've untagged (deleted the page, in fact). GeneralNotability (talk) 01:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)