Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ignaciobm/Archive

28 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets

-added by DB


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Ignaciobm and all of the socks above have been complaining about biased writing, lack of objectivity etc on Talk:Falkland Islands and creating content forks such as Islas del Atlántico Sur Department (now converted to a redirect). Ignaciobm's contribution history bears a strong resemblance to being a sleeper of the prolific banned sock puppeteer User:Alex79818, he created a number of sleeper accounts, which are periodically revived to start disruption on topics related to the Falkland Islands. A new account, Amcimino's sole contribution is to remove a CSD A10 on an article created by Ignaciobm. Being charitable the IP contributions whilst obviously Ignaciobm may simply be forgetting to log in. Wee Curry Monster talk 19:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

The IP 80... is me, from france, forgot to log in. I am not Amcimino or Grupo7 or Alex or any other. I would give you my real identity ir order to prove i am not the others, but this seems to be an attack in order to avoid the opening of new discussions about the neutrality of Falkland Islands articles. I created the Article Islas del Atlántico Sur Department, getting inspired from the spanish version, but I was not even able to complete it before it was erased. Just trying to improve Wikipedia in english, but clearly not able with some fanatic users censoring. With this I finish my participation in English Wikipedia, I don't believe in it any more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ignaciobm (talk • contribs) 20:53, 28 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I am sure that this is the strategy of these people who own Falkland/Malvinas related wikipedia articles. Those who try to get a neutral version of these articles will be accused again and again of tricking with IP adressess and censored of making any comment or initiating discussions... a lot of effort ruined by some fanatics. Ignaciobm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ignaciobm (talk • contribs) 22:13, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * That's nice. Please keep your comments up here out of the admin/clerk area. And since you are calling everyone who disagrees with you a "fanatic", it is easy to see that you are really the neutral one here. But lets go ahead and get that CU just for grins and giggles. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 22:34, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you Mr DoRD. Now with the "remember me" activated. I have nothing to hide :) I was just trying to suggest to neutralize an article I think (and many other users) is far away of being neutral, and thus attacked (the same with my article that exists in many other languages but not in english). I hope someone does it one day, improving wikipedia. Bye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ignaciobm (talk • contribs) 20:58, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm Grupo7 and I have nothing to do with the other users who were complaining about the neutrality of the article. I was only trying to improve Wikipedia. Grupo7-ARI2012 (talk) 01:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Plenty for a duck block but the spidey sense says there may be more. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 21:00, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Named users are ❌. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:02, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * As Ignaciobm has connected themselves to the IP edits, I strongly suggest that they take care to be sure to log in before editing to avoid the appearance of sockpuppetry via anonymous editing. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)