Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ImageFInder913/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I'm not entirely sure if this is sockpuppetry, or possibly several COI and UPEs who work for the same company, however there's a suspicious pattern of editing here:
 * ImageFinder913 originally made some edits to Nigel Botterill back in October. These are the only edits they have made, until rapidly re-appearing in time to !vote on the AFD
 * Conker095 appeared recently to push some highly promotional and copyvio content into Nigel Botterill and after a discussion with me on my talk page, acknowledged being a paid editor and agreed to stop editing the page. They have not, to be fair, contributed to the AFD.
 * Finally, EditUK84 is a brand new SPA who appeared to make one substantial edit to Nigel Botterill and then !vote on the AFD.

I strongly suspect these are either sockpuppets, or meatpuppets working with/for the subject of the article or one of the companies associated with him. Either way, the voting on the AFD is suspicious and potentially disruptive if it gives a false impression of consensus. Hugsyrup (talk) 08:24, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Checkuser comment: Technical evidence shows that the following are likely to be socks of each other.

--Risker (talk) 18:19, 11 July 2019 (UTC)


 * ST47 (talk) 17:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)