Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ineversigninsodonotmessageme/Archive

Evidence submitted by Melesse
Been a pretty long time, but I remember this person very well because she was so persistent in falsely submitting copyrighted images as freely licensed. Most edits have been to add pictures that were uploaded to Commons, some of them were deleted for lacking proof of permission. I recall that some years ago she was community banned from both here and Commons for repeatedly doing this. Melesse (talk) 22:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Forgot to also mention that one of the user's previous socks professed to being a huge Lisa Gerrard fan and that GerrardRecords has only edited the Lisa Gerrard article. Melesse (talk) 22:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Whether a sock or not, this account has violated our username policy. Were that name accurate, that organization has a significant conflict of interest on the Lisa Gerrard article. I have indefinitely blocked with a Uw-spamublock notice. — Satori Son 16:41, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

As the block is justified on username grounds alone, no need to explore further whether this is also a sock. Tim Song (talk) 22:32, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

18 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

I'm very new to this, lol. But, some others and myself believes the Lisa Gerrard vandal is back, uploading the "illegal" photos. The user uploaded the two photos that were deleted from Commons as copyvios from Getty images under the name Gandalf1982. That user only edited the page or edited anything that involves Lisa Gerrard, and delete the legal photos. I do recall that this case was discussed before. I don't want to accuse that user, but it seemed fishy to me. Cheers. QuoteTheRavenHair (talk) 17:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)