Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Infinitejjang/Archive

01 February 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Infinitejjang has already been blocked twice, mainly for removing Sungjong from Template:Infinite and Infinite (band). [], [], [] As well, user has changed the official profile birthdate of Sungjong from 9/03 to 10/05 []. After this block, IntlnltetroII came active with the same edits - and blocked as well. [] []. Recently two more socks have entered the picture with the exact same edits. INSPIRITyoungwon [] [] INSPIRITforever [] [] Quacks like a duck, must be a duck. Evaders99 (talk) 02:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've protected the Infinite article for awhile. I'm also adding a CU onto this for confirmation and sleepers. IntlnltetroII is blocked and tagged as LTA, so I'm curious what that's about. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Compliments to you for your clear report. The listed accounts are all ✅, along with:
 * The semi-protection is also a jolly good call, as a rangeblock doesn't look realistic. WilliamH (talk) 13:41, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The semi-protection is also a jolly good call, as a rangeblock doesn't look realistic. WilliamH (talk) 13:41, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:13, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

18 March 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All these accounts have engaged in the same behavior as in the article Infinite (band) of changing a member's birth date from September 3 to October 5    , even after I pointed out the record label's official profile, where the birth date checks out as September 3. Requesting CheckUser to sniff out any more hidden socks. — ξ xplicit  19:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All five are ✅ matches to previous socks. A rangeblock is not possible. WilliamH (talk) 20:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  21:20, 18 March 2012 (UTC)