Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Inhwiki/Archive

Report date May 16 2009, 06:09 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Votestacking at Articles for deletion/Sacred Gin. Note that 90.193.10.67 has been blocked for 1 year for making a legal threat as noted. Both IPs go to London to the same ISP. All rationales for keeping are nearly identical. MuZemike 06:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by MuZemike


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by MuZemike 06:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests
 * While I think it sucks, CheckUser requests are not to be ran unless the !vote stacking effected the outcome. Tiptoety  talk 06:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

CU not needed; we can WP:DUCK block and strike the votes, as the discussion has not closed yet. — Jake   Wartenberg  21:06, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Post-close note, I blocked for displaying the same behaviour. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 20:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC) Post-close note I blocked for displaying the same behaviour. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 16:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions


 * WP:DUCK. SPAs with edits only to the AfD. Accounts blocked indefinitely and the IPs softblocked for a week. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 21:11, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Accounts tagged; looks good. Archiving.  —  Jake   Wartenberg  21:18, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Report date May 18 2009, 12:42 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

New account to get round sockpuppetry ban. Making disruptive edits to deletion discussion (striking through votes that user disagrees with). Admits previous sockpuppetry. Previous sockpuppets & anon contribs included legal threats (see previous sockpuppetry case). User claims that some of the banned socks were not him. TrulyBlue (talk) 12:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by TrulyBlue (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by TrulyBlue (talk) 12:42, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * No CU needed to confirm in this case, duck block. Nathan  T 15:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions


 * Blocked and tagged. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 15:18, 18 May 2009 (UTC)