Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/IrzaKhanz69/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

And again, on Zara Noor Abbas. SPAs trying to change info on the article. Pahunkat (talk) 16:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

- Change spouses to Hania Amir (scroll down), compare this to confirmed socks: ,

Hash also doesn't like blank parameters in the infobox, much the same as confirmed socks:

Like Sarah, will blank the talk page at the notification of sockpuppetry:, compared to

Also the strange fact that all socks end with numbers.

There are other SPAs editing the article, not sure if they are related or not. Hopefully a CU can sort this out again.

Comment: And the moment I file this SPI report, Hash quickly reverts back to ravensfire's version despite trying to change the information in the article before.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. Bagging and tagging sock. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)
 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All socks are fixated on editing the article Zara Noor Abbas.

Originally, the IP startes editing, with HaniaKhan38 then continuing.

Master is reverted twice, whilst inserting the same paragraph, and then BunnyQueen comes along to insert the same sentence to the personal life section-

BunnyQueen is reverted after a while by aflyingeditor, and then another user - Vjgviiv656 - comes to revert that:

Finally, Ghfuv58 enters:. However, is more convincing, where they're trying to revert Ravensfire back to BunnyQueen in a different article.

In short, for three of the accounts compare these diffs:, ,.

Pahunkat (talk) 16:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Could a clerk retag the socks above to the new new master? I would do it myself but I'm aware these are CU blocks and don't want to mess anything up. Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 10:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Also found and ✅:
 * Also found and :
 * Confirmed socks will be bagged and tagged. The likely user might need a behavioral investigation. Leaving that up to the clerks. This SPI should also be renamed to the correct master, . Also leaving that to the clerks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   21:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * Also found and :
 * Confirmed socks will be bagged and tagged. The likely user might need a behavioral investigation. Leaving that up to the clerks. This SPI should also be renamed to the correct master, . Also leaving that to the clerks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   21:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and :
 * Confirmed socks will be bagged and tagged. The likely user might need a behavioral investigation. Leaving that up to the clerks. This SPI should also be renamed to the correct master, . Also leaving that to the clerks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   21:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and :
 * Confirmed socks will be bagged and tagged. The likely user might need a behavioral investigation. Leaving that up to the clerks. This SPI should also be renamed to the correct master, . Also leaving that to the clerks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   21:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Confirmed socks will be bagged and tagged. The likely user might need a behavioral investigation. Leaving that up to the clerks. This SPI should also be renamed to the correct master, . Also leaving that to the clerks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   21:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Confirmed socks will be bagged and tagged. The likely user might need a behavioral investigation. Leaving that up to the clerks. This SPI should also be renamed to the correct master, . Also leaving that to the clerks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   21:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * moved case to oldest account. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 12:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Socks are retagged, closing. Sro23 (talk) 22:45, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I'm filing a separate report because if confirmed then this will be the new sockmaster. See contribs of, compared to that of Sarah  Pahunkat (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. This account will be bagged and tagged, and the SPI will be renamed to the new master and closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This account is a known sockpuppeteer, as per Sockpuppet investigations/Xhchvk67. However, I think there's a chance this could be IzraKhanz69 because of the similarities in username (all known socks of both sockpuppeteer end with numbers), the fact that Xhchvk67 has only edited on Zara Noor Abbas, one of Izra's main targets, at the same time as a confirmed sockpuppet (Hash4864, see archives), and the fact that several of Xhchvk67's socks attacked an article at the same time, exhibiting the same behaviour as IzraKhan69. Filing to get a CU as whilst this issue was brought up in Xhchvk67's investgation, it was brought up after the investigation was closed. Pahunkat (talk) 09:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * There's definitely enough evidence to say that this is ✅. I'll re-tag this account as a sock of the master. Closing SPI...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)
 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

BLP vandalism socks focused on Pakistani actresses and porn actresses. They mostly will insert unreferened claims into infoboxes, often replacing the already present sourced info. For example, here's two accounts both trying to add the ridiculous claim that the parent of an actress is another actress only a few years older than her:. Here they are replacing sourced info with an unsourced claim:. More ridiculous claims that one actress is the parent of another:. I've already blocked these accounts, but I want to request CU because I have a feeling there are more lurking about. Sro23 (talk) 19:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Xhchvk67 was one of the SPAs that I mentioned on the last report for the sock master Izrakhanz69. I think there’s a large possibility this is the same one, as usernames follow the same pattern (all end in numbers, like the master). Pahunkat (talk) 22:32, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing own request. Please check for sleepers/older accounts. Sro23 (talk) 19:30, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * All socks will be bagged and tagged. Moving case under correct master. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * All socks will be bagged and tagged. Moving case under correct master. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * All socks will be bagged and tagged. Moving case under correct master. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * All socks will be bagged and tagged. Moving case under correct master. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * All socks will be bagged and tagged. Moving case under correct master. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * All socks will be bagged and tagged. Moving case under correct master. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * All socks will be bagged and tagged. Moving case under correct master. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * All socks will be bagged and tagged. Moving case under correct master. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * All socks will be bagged and tagged. Moving case under correct master. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Uh oh...I'm sorry for not noticing, but behaviorally, this SPI looks to actually be Sockpuppet investigations/IrzaKhanz69. Sro23 (talk) 22:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Sro23 - No worries. We can't memorize the patterns of everyone! ;-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Reverting edits on, and  to edits by previous socks NJD-DE (talk) 22:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI case can be closed.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:54, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same edit (Special:Diff/1002527305) like previous sock Sasha83373 (Special:Diff/998503291) NJD-DE (talk) 21:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

. They've been using more IPs lately, but this is them - restoring their diff, note also that the username ends with a number like all socks in the archive. Pahunkat (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm requesting a CU to scan for sleepers, the sudden drop of the use of accounts is odd when normally they use both at the same time. Given that they target BLPs it would be beneficial if more of their target articles could be found. Pahunkat (talk) 09:28, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Given the history of sleeper use, please check if any exist now. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * - Mz7 (talk) 00:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅, but . Sock tag added, closing. Mz7 (talk) 00:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Editing the relatives of Ushna Shah, see this compared to that of a confirmed sock and another of a confirmed sock. Please check for sleepers if confirmed given previous sleeper usage. Same sort of username pattern. Pahunkat (talk) 20:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Additionally may be connected given that they're a SPA that has also edited the article to change information about relatives, but other socks haven't tried to implement the same changes as that account and they haven't edited since the 5th of January so a check may not be useful. Leaving up to a CU's discretion. Pahunkat (talk) 20:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Also found and ✅:
 * Bagging and tagging all socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging all socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging all socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Almost identical username to one in the archive (see confirmed socks), and modifying the information about relatives at one of Irza's target articles, Sanam Jung. Pahunkat (talk) 22:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - previous checks have found further accounts, so a CU seems useful. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * . Same geolocation and range, different user agents.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * With the CU result, similar username and similar edit I see enough for a block. Tagged. Close. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 23:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Irza again, see their edit compared to one of a confirmed sock. Adding another account I noticed after the second last check revealed two more BLP targets (Dydyd536, see this compared to that). Please check for other accounts if possible Pahunkat (talk) 09:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

- I think you should see that username :-) Pahunkat (talk) 09:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * - could you please check for the record as well? They seem to have the same sort of username per archives, as well as same sort of edits as Ayeshatistitc47. Pahunkat (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ =  =  = . All blocked. Sleeper sweep completed. - Mailer Diablo 20:33, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, = . It's already blocked anyway. - Mailer Diablo 20:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks like there's nothing left to do here, closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edits are similar to previous socks in inserting random marriages between porn stars and south asian celebrities. Compare to  Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Whack a mole and username harassment. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Some people just don't quit. Sro23 (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Quack - compare this to sock. Similar usernames. Pahunkat (talk) 13:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * On second thoughts, changing to CUrequest as per all cases bar one for sleeper checks and to find more BLP targets. Pahunkat (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Agreed. Blocked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * .  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

For Uuvuc8 compare a confirmed sock to their edit.

The other account is on Sana Fakhar, compare this edit to this IP. IP is a likely sock based on this edit which replicates a sock.

Username similarities, see archives. As per usual for this master, requesting a CU to check for sleepers and to find more targets. Pahunkat (talk) 11:00, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Edit: Adding - compare this edit to one by Uuvuc8. Pahunkat (talk) 16:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Given these accounts were created before the last check. Please see if there are any other missed accounts. Sro23 (talk) 16:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅. Bagging and tagging sock. . This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   17:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

On Ushna Shah, compare confirmed socks to Uvig8b96, ZarahAnsari. For Terminator8229 compare to previous diffs and this to a suspected sock Pahunkat (talk) 11:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I don't have my hopes up about this, but if there's any way for a CU to clarify whether IrzaKhanz69 is a unique operator, that would be helpful. The Cyphoidterminator92 account was declared a Khan sock by, but behaviorally, this account is bleeding together with Bttowadch and Patiparmeshwar in the edit history at . Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ to one another:
 * These accounts are, leaning , to . Same IP range, same user agents.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   07:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * These accounts are, leaning , to . Same IP range, same user agents.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   07:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * These accounts are, leaning , to . Same IP range, same user agents.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   07:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * These accounts are, leaning , to . Same IP range, same user agents.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   07:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Cabayi (talk) 21:56, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Quack, Quack. On Ushna Shah, see. Username similarities, see archives... Pahunkat (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , leaning . Same IP range, different user agents.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Cabayi (talk) 21:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Compare this to a confirmed sock. Note the formatting to create line breaks as well. Pahunkat (talk) 18:30, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Very . The following accounts are ✅ to UlluDaPathaBatli:
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 09:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 09:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 09:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 09:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Reverts to a version by other socks. NJD-DE (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU is interestingly inconclusive on this one, but ., closing. Mz7 (talk) 20:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The usual addition of nonsense relatives. Fixation on Hania is also relevant (compare .) M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 21:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

These are the same style of editing. the differences. new and old/blocked Hasan (talk) 22:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * .  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:29, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 23:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Vandalizing BLP of porn actress Nicole Aniston with claim of marriage to Pakistani actress Hania Aamir at 08:35, 14 March 2021 (UTC). Compare to similar edits by confirmed sockpuppets:
 * 15:54, 2 January 2021 (at Zara Noor Abbas)
 * 17:44, 5 January 2021 (at Sasha Grey)
 * 18:26, 5 January 2021 (at Christy Mack)
 * 05:31, 6 January 2021 (at Mia Malkova)
 * 04:52, 6 January 2021 (at Lisa Ann)
 * 07:24, 6 January 2021 (at April O'Neil (actress))
 * 22:33, 7 January 2021 (at Christy Mack)
 * 21:36, 24 January 2021 (at Sasha Grey)
 * 07:39, 9 February 2021 (at Zara Noor Abbas)
 * 09:54, 10 February 2021 (at Valentina Nappi)
 * 01:33, 11 February 2021 (at Kayden Kross)
 * 08:36, 14 February 2021 (at Riley Reid)
 * 11:45, 11 March 2021 (at Sanam Baloch) Sangdeboeuf (talk) 10:17, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Sure looks like them. Can a CU find any others? Pahunkat (talk) 11:14, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU was just run two days ago, so I've just gone ahead - Sro23 (talk) 19:11, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

On Ramsha Khan, a previous target of the user until the page was semi protected, modifying infoboxes with regards to relations. Same fixation on Hania Aamir, see archives. Username. Pahunkat (talk) 17:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: Throwing in Vjvibixugo8 for free - do I need to say anything for this one? Pahunkat (talk) 21:26, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Compare Vjvibixugo8's contribs to list of porn actresses similarly vandalized at Sockpuppet investigations/IrzaKhanz69/Archive. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - with a refresh of the watchlist, I find two more users: Miansahab22389 and Sheikhsahab2190. Once again adding Hania Aamir to the spouse section of the infobox. Pahunkat (talk) 17:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment (again)  Adding Aliyaafridi921038 who did the exact same thing. Reverted a throwaway IP on another article. Pahunkat (talk) 17:58, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Again!  This is ridiculous - I've just found Askdlj9290, Kjhasdud9282. Checkuser requested - please check for others (pretty certain there will be some), and see if a rangeblock is possible. Pahunkat (talk) 18:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Added Saraedlarxs9s0, see their contribs (and their filter log, they seem to want to edit my userpage). Pahunkat (talk) 18:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * FYI in case you're wondering who that is Pahunkat (talk) 18:11, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , indeed I was wondering! Thanks for letting me know. Just another day of LTAs trying to troll. Ashley  yoursmile!  18:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Also revdel that user's comment on their revert if possible, it's grossly offending. Pahunkat (talk) 18:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Looks like they've quietened down. Maybe the block of the last account autoblocked the others. Pahunkat (talk) 18:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:12, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The usual. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 21:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Du hast eine Ente, nichts? Nice edit summary when reverting :-) Pahunkat (talk) 21:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Ich bin Irza, das eigensinnige Entchen / Komm aus Pakistan, welch hat über 200 Milliarden Menschen / Zuerst fand ich mich bei SPI / Dann wieder noch; gerade gibt es zwei Sorry, I tried... M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 21:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocking and tagging sockpuppet. Sro23 (talk) 22:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Quacks very loudly. Pahunkat (talk) 08:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Aldjadau9w is also quacking. Pahunkat (talk) 09:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Aldjadau9w is ✅. AKSJHas12w is ., closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The usual, again. Requesting CU to look for sleepers since it's been a while since the last check. Pahunkat (talk) 12:31, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * And adding who is messing around with relations in the infobox of Zara Noor Abbas. Compare their edit to the others on the page. Pahunkat (talk) 12:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Adding, an account whose sole purpose is to change the relations in infoboxes. Pahunkat (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Mz7 (talk) 03:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus the following accounts:
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts, closing. Mz7 (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets


Likely not the actress in question when they make this edit. Exactly identical to this made by a cu-blocked IP, and should also be obvious from past cases. Pahunkat (talk) 09:08, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

. M Imtiaz (talk · contribs) 15:14, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * .  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   02:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Blocking and tagging. Sro23 (talk) 21:31, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

After a very long wait, a SPA comes to make this edit fiddling with information about relatives in the infobox. Cutting it close, but hopefully this isn't stale for a check - master usually has sleepers, and not quite 3 months since the last check. See also and  made by confirmed socks. Pahunkat (talk) 08:05, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Adding, see . Pahunkat (talk) 09:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is to .  enough that I've gone ahead and  them.. - TheresNoTime 😺 22:06, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * is an additional, to the above listed accounts.  - TheresNoTime 😺 22:07, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See, usual fiddling with infobox parameters. Compare to. This wasn't picked up on the last CU so requesting it in case there's any more. Pahunkat (talk) 08:17, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
 * added, the user has added a random spouse to the infobox of another BLP actress. Pahunkat (talk) 08:33, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * added, see - usual fixation. Pahunkat (talk) 13:09, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Also found and ✅:
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Also found and ✅:
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * All accounts will be bagged and tagged. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:32, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See, obvious duck. Pahunkat (talk) 08:56, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Same disruption with, perhaps a longer block here is warranted given that the only edits coming from it since March have obviously been from the same person. Pahunkat (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've semi-protected Nadia Khan for a year. Closing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See, regular nonsense changing information on a BLPs spouse. Pahunkat (talk) 18:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. ., closing. Mz7 (talk) 20:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Happened to come across this account on my watchlist. The account is making random changes to the spouse section of infoboxes (e.g, ) to previous IrzaKhanz69 targets, which is characteristic behaviour of this sockpuppeteer. This master tends to have other, undetected accounts so would it be possible for a CU to conduct a sleeper check, even though it is blocked? Pahunkat (talk) 19:47, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Also is an much older and unblocked account of this master. Consider if it needs blocking. Pahunkat (talk) 19:51, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Geolocation is right, but . Closing because the account is already blocked; no action needed against the stale account. Mz7 (talk) 01:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC)