Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ism schism/Archive

Evidence submitted by User:wikidas
Recreation of deleted article with a large contribution of Ism schism by a sock Rush88 and   Wikid as&#169; 12:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
I'm not seeing much concrete evidence here to convince me that sock puppetry is going on, I'm afraid. MuZemike 21:16, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
I agree with MuZemike here. Just because an account recreated an article that was also edited by Ism schism does not mean they are a sock of Ism schism. I will note that Ism schism has over 8,000 contributions, so it is not a big leap that someone would recreate an article that he edited. Also, looking over some other things it appears the filing party has some negative history with the accused making me think this case was filed in bad faith. As such, I am recommending this case be closed. Tiptoety talk 07:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)