Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ItSmileyRiley/Archive

21 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I'll admit, my evidence ain't the strongest on this one, but some circumstantial stuff is setting off my BS detector. In these edit ItSmileyRiley removes sources from KC Undercover and changes some quotes to italics. The source removal was improper and I warned them for that on their talk page, but the quote/italic fix was sound. They also removed an embedded note with no explanation. Soon after my reversion, DisneyChannelFan18 removed the embedded note, removed the reference, and mucked up the boldface / italics formatting. Seems a bizarre follow-up edit. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:22, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Provided behavioural evidence is nice and concise and seems to me to be enough for a check. The technical relationship between the listed accounts is bordering on. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 04:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Given the checkuser results and the not so strong evidence, I'm going to close this with no action taken. Mike V • Talk 05:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)